- #1

- 12

- 0

However i've found, that alot of people use the Bernoullis equation (rewritten) to calculate the exhaust velocity with the formula:

However there is no mass involved here?

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- #1

- 12

- 0

However i've found, that alot of people use the Bernoullis equation (rewritten) to calculate the exhaust velocity with the formula:

However there is no mass involved here?

- #2

- 333

- 257

The denominator is density. Mass is 'involved' there.

- #3

- 12

- 0

Indeed, but then it doesn't matter if there is 50 ml of water or 450 ml of water. This makes no sense to me tbh.The denominator is density. Mass is 'involved' there.

- #4

- 333

- 257

I suspect that the reason that more water results in lower velocity is because there is less gas. The pressure decays as the water is expelled - that rate of reduction is higher if there is less gas (initially). The initial velocities should be the same.

- #5

- 12

- 0

I was wondering if there is a good model for pressure as a function of time?

- #6

russ_watters

Mentor

- 21,203

- 8,015

If you have density and you want mass, you just multiply by volume. If you have velocity and you want volumetric flow rate, multiply by cross sectional area. Like any equation/model, Bernoulli's equation is adaptable, you just have to ask it the question you want it to answer!Indeed, but then it doesn't matter if there is 50 ml of water or 450 ml of water. This makes no sense to me tbh.

- #7

Mister T

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 2,735

- 949

Indeed, but then it doesn't matter if there is 50 ml of water or 450 ml of water. This makes no sense to me tbh.

If you have nine times as much volume you also have nine times as much mass. Think of it this way. When 450 mL of water is expelled you can imagine breaking that stream of ejected fluid into nine equal 50 mL segments. The last segment, for example, is ejected at the same speed as the first segment, provided the pressure difference is the same.

- #8

gmax137

Science Advisor

- 2,047

- 1,495

Yes, but this is not the situation for a 1/2 liter bottle initially filled halfway with liquid. The gas pressure (driving the flow out the nozzle) decreases as the liquid is discharged and the gas expands.provided the pressure difference is the same.

You can use Bernoulli to determine the initial nozzle velocity (pretty much pressure head becomes velocity head) but to solve for the time-dependent velocity you have to also model the expansion of the gas.

- #9

cjl

Science Advisor

- 1,917

- 486

- #10

- 12

- 0

Yeah, that might actually be a solution. Just to make sure, when you write dv/dt are you saying v as velocity or do you mean V as in volume. It would make more sense if the change in volume with respect to time is related to the mass flow rate

- #11

Mister T

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 2,735

- 949

Yes, but this is not the situation for a 1/2 liter bottle initially filled halfway with liquid.

You introduced the equation ##v_{ex}=\sqrt{\frac{2(p_{in}-p_{out})}{\rho_w}}## into this discussion, and wanted to understand the role played by mass. I tried to explain that to you.

The fact that that ##p_{in}## is not constant in your particular application of that equation has no bearing on the explanation. In other words, try to understand the role played by mass when ##p_{in}## is constant so that you can then understand the more complicated situation when it's not constant.

- #12

cjl

Science Advisor

- 1,917

- 486

I meant volume, but I can see how that notation was unclear. You can also of course obtain velocity, but you also have to account for the fact that the mass is non-constant.Yeah, that might actually be a solution. Just to make sure, when you write dv/dt are you saying v as velocity or do you mean V as in volume. It would make more sense if the change in volume with respect to time is related to the mass flow rate

- #13

gmax137

Science Advisor

- 2,047

- 1,495

I think you have me confused with the OP.You introduced the equation ##v_{ex}=\sqrt{\frac{2(p_{in}-p_{out})}{\rho_w}}## into this discussion, and wanted to understand the role played by mass. I tried to explain that to you.

The fact that that ##p_{in}## is not constant in your particular application of that equation has no bearing on the explanation. In other words, try to understand the role played by mass when ##p_{in}## is constant so that you can then understand the more complicated situation when it's not constant.

Share: