Bernoulli’s Equation for plugging finger into dike under water

  • Thread starter Thread starter member 731016
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Water
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the application of Bernoulli's Equation in fluid dynamics, specifically regarding the assumptions made for water flow around a hole in a dike. Participants clarify that the water outside the hole can be considered stationary (v1 = 0) when analyzing the pressure at the water surface, which is at 1 atm. They also discuss the pressure conditions at different depths, noting that at 2 meters below the surface, the pressure is 1 atm plus an additional 20.2 kPa. The conversation emphasizes the importance of selecting appropriate points in the streamline for accurate calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Bernoulli's Equation
  • Knowledge of fluid statics and dynamics
  • Familiarity with pressure measurements in fluids
  • Concept of streamlines in fluid flow
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of Bernoulli's Equation in various fluid scenarios
  • Learn about pressure variations in fluids at different depths
  • Explore the concept of streamlines and their significance in fluid mechanics
  • Investigate real-world applications of Bernoulli's principle in engineering
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in engineering, particularly those focusing on fluid mechanics, civil engineers working with hydraulic structures, and anyone interested in the principles of fluid dynamics.

member 731016
Homework Statement
A legendary Dutch boy saved Holland by plugging a hole
of diameter 1.20 cm in a dike with his finger. If the hole was 2.00 m below the surface of the North Sea (density 1030 kg/m^3) (b) If he pulled his finger out of the hole, during what time interval would the released water fill 1 acre of land to a depth of 1 ft? Assume the hole remained constant in size.
Relevant Equations
Bernoulli’s Equation
For this part (b) of this problem
1670119512790.png
,
The solution is,
1670119564095.png

1670119694881.png

However, why are they allowed to assume for the Bernoulli's equation for the water outside the hole, that the water is stationary (i.e v_1 = 0)?

It also appears that they assume that the pressure inside the Holland is 1 atm, which is only valid when the water level is below the hole.

Many thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Callumnc1 said:
, why are they allowed to assume for the Bernoulli's equation for the water outside the hole, that the water is stationary (i.e v_1 = 0)?
On the sea side, I assume you mean.
You are right that immediately in front of the hole the water will be moving some, but also the pressure will have dropped a little in consequence. As you move a bit further back into the water, both of those effects diminish.
You could also forget about that region and instead consider the water surface. That certainly gives v1=0, z1=2m, p1=atm.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: member 731016
haruspex said:
On the sea side, I assume you mean.
You are right that immediately in front of the hole the water will be moving some, but also the pressure will have dropped a little in consequence. As you move a bit further back into the water, both of those effects diminish.
You could also forget about that region and instead consider the water surface. That certainly gives v1=0, z1=2m, p1=atm.
Thanks for your reply @haruspex ! I was assuming Holland was 2 m below the water as the problem says that. Were you assuming Holland was at sea level?

Is that why you said that I would be allowed to forget about that region and instead consider the water surface? The water surface is at 1 atm, while the region at the same height as the hole (2m below the surface) is at 1 atm + 20.2 kPa.

Many thanks!
 
Callumnc1 said:
Were you assuming Holland was at sea level?
No.
In using Bernoull's principle you pick any two points in the 'streamline'. You have the exit point on the Holland side of the hole, but on the water side you do not have to choose a point right in front of the hole. For the reasons I gave, it is not entirely clear what the velocity and pressure are there. Instead, you can choose a point somewhat further away, on the same level, or a point on the surface. The first will give a pressure patm+gρz (z=2m) and a height difference zero, the second will give a pressure patm and a height difference z=2m. Either way, it adds up to the same.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: member 731016
haruspex said:
No.
In using Bernoull's principle you pick any two points in the 'streamline'. You have the exit point on the Holland side of the hole, but on the water side you do not have to choose a point right in front of the hole. For the reasons I gave, it is not entirely clear what the velocity and pressure are there. Instead, you can choose a point somewhat further away, on the same level, or a point on the surface. The first will give a pressure patm+gρz (z=2m) and a height difference zero, the second will give a pressure patm and a height difference z=2m. Either way, it adds up to the same.
Oooh thanks so much @haruspex , I understand now!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K