Best and most recent book for ICF?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kidphysics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the search for an up-to-date, comprehensive book on Inertial Confinement Fusion (ICF), with participants noting the importance of recent publications due to advancements in the field. The most recent book mentioned is from 1998, while older texts, such as a 1982 publication by Duderstadt and Moses, are still considered relevant. Participants express concern over the failure of the National Ignition Facility (NIF) to achieve ignition, which was a key goal of its research. Speculations arise regarding the funding and future direction of NIF, particularly its reliance on Department of Defense support. Overall, the conversation highlights the ongoing challenges and the need for updated resources in the field of ICF.
Kidphysics
Messages
164
Reaction score
0
Hopefully it is the same book but I'm looking for an up to date detailed book concerning all aspects of Inertial Confinement Fusion. You may also post any good PDFs if you have them! I know there are these IFSA books but I'm not sure the most recent which seems to be quite important because of the advancing field.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Kidphysics said:
Hopefully it is the same book but I'm looking for an up to date detailed book concerning all aspects of Inertial Confinement Fusion. You may also post any good PDFs if you have them! I know there are these IFSA books but I'm not sure the most recent which seems to be quite important because of the advancing field.
I think that nothing newer than this book: http://books.google.ge/books?id=-x5RAAAAMAAJ&source=gbs_similarbooks published in 1998
Though, even this book published in 1982, James J. Duderstadt, Gregory A. Moses, Inertial Confinement Fusion: http://books.google.ge/books/about/Inertial_confinement_fusion.html?id=RHNTAAAAMAAJ&redir_esc=y gives good idea what inertial confinement is.
I have a Russian translation of this book and can say you that this book is still actual for everyone interested in this branch of fusion. No new approach since that time.
Exept the news that NIF (laser fusion) program failured, as well as people refused electron and light ions (lithium) driven fusion and only heavy ions (cesium) driven fusion still is in consideration.
The book is quite informative about principles of hohlraum design, etc.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
NIF failed? Damn...
 
Drakkith said:
NIF failed? Damn...
National Ignition Facility (NIF) could not achieve expected ignition. http://www.physicstoday.org/daily_edition/politics_and_policy/nif_to_shift_emphasis_after_the_facility_s_failure_to_achieve_ignition
On 30 September the National Ignition Facility's (NIF's) two-year-long National Ignition Campaign (NIC) officially came to an end. Despite multiple attempts on the part of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory scientists to create miniature laser-driven thermonuclear explosions, they failed to achieve ignition, the point at which the fusion energy yield exceeds the energy required to start the reaction. In addition, Donald Cook, the National Nuclear Security Administration's (NNSA's) deputy administrator for defense programs, admits that NIF also failed to attain an intermediate milestone where alpha particles created in the fusion process start to contribute significant amounts of heat to the plasma.
What does this mean? Success?

There are some speculations that NIF is not a fusion program totally being funding also by Department of Defense. May be Department of Defense has truly funded in NIF. But we can not ignore the fact that by its nature NIF is a laser driven fusion machine with no ignition achieved.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Joseph Chikva said:
National Ignition Facility (NIF) could not achieve expected ignition. What does this mean? Success?

There are some speculations that NIF is not a fusion program totally being funding also by Department of Defense. May be Department of Defense has truly funded in NIF. But we can not ignore the fact that by its nature NIF is a laser driven fusion machine with no ignition achieved.

I'd call that a failure if its goal was to achieve ignition.
 
Drakkith said:
I'd call that a failure if its goal was to achieve ignition.
I hope that your English is much better than mine:
Despite multiple attempts on the part of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory scientists to create miniature laser-driven thermonuclear explosions, they failed to achieve ignition,...
 
Yeah, looks like a failure to me. Well, that's the way it goes sometimes.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
6K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
6K
Replies
26
Views
4K
Replies
34
Views
5K
Back
Top