Best book for Lagrangian of classical, scalar, relativistic field?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on finding the best resources for understanding the Lagrangian of a classical, real, scalar, relativistic field. Participants recommend "Special Relativity and Classical Field Theory" by Leonard Susskind and Art Friedman as a foundational text. Additionally, they suggest reviewing Chapter 13 of "Classical Mechanics" by Goldstein and Chapter 2 of "Field Quantization" by Greiner. The conversation emphasizes the importance of making educated guesses for Lagrangian formulations and validating them through experimental comparison.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of classical mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with relativistic physics concepts
  • Basic knowledge of Lagrangian mechanics
  • Exposure to quantum field theory fundamentals
NEXT STEPS
  • Read "Special Relativity and Classical Field Theory" by Leonard Susskind and Art Friedman
  • Study Chapter 13 in "Classical Mechanics" by Goldstein
  • Review Chapter 2 in "Field Quantization" by Greiner
  • Explore T. D. Lee's lecture notes on Quantum Field Theory
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in theoretical physics, particularly those interested in classical and quantum field theories, as well as anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of Lagrangian mechanics.

StenEdeback
Messages
65
Reaction score
38
Hi all experts!

I would like to read about the Lagrangian of a classical (non-quantum), real, scalar, relativistic field and how it is derived. What is the best book for that purpose?Sten Edebäck
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What aspects that were not covered by your latest thread do you want to know about? There really is not much more to it.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: StenEdeback
Well, I am still curious about the formula in the attached file. It is not the same as the Lagrangian that I am used to. My question is really: "How do you arrive at the Lagrangian formula in the attached file? And how do you prove that it is useful, that is describes a physical system?"
 

Attachments

  • Lagrangian density classical relativistic field.jpg
    Lagrangian density classical relativistic field.jpg
    28.2 KB · Views: 143
Generally, you do not arrive at a Lagrangian. You assume a Lagrangian and from that you compute the equations of motion and compare to experiments. In some cases, it is possible to make educated guesses regarding what the Lagrangian should be based on what you know about a system.

StenEdeback said:
It is not the same as the Lagrangian that I am used to.
It seems to be the standard Lagrangian for a scalar field. What Lagrangian are you used to?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: StenEdeback, malawi_glenn and vanhees71
You can use symmetry principles to restrict your lagrangian
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: StenEdeback and vanhees71
Thank you! I have understood now that you make an "educated guess" to find the Lagrangian and then check if it works. My problem is basically that I need knowledge of classical relativistic fields, so I have now started to read the book "Special relativity and classical field theory" by Leonard Susskind and Art Friedman, and that has already spread some light over my foggy thoughts. So, to study Quantum Field Theory I first need to study some Classical Field Theory. It is the same situation as when I started to study String Theory which I was curious about. After a while I found that I needed knowledge about Quantum Field Theory. So I started reading at the top and then needed to go down stepwise. It is still very interesting and fun. And Physics Forums have knowledgeable and helpful people, which is very valuable to me. Thank you so much again!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
Chapter 13 in Goldstein's classical mechanics is a decent read.

And then you realize that in order to study this chapter, you need to read many more chapters in that book.
And so on :)

Chapter 2 in Greiners "Field quantization"

Chapter 1 - Tongs qft lecture notes https://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/tong/qft.html
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: StenEdeback and vanhees71
Thank you! I will have plenty to read. :)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71

Similar threads

Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
7K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K