Best Book for Self-Teaching Classical Physics

  • Thread starter Thread starter MrApex
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Resource
AI Thread Summary
For self-teaching classical physics, several textbooks are recommended, including "Physics for Scientists and Engineers" by Serway, "Fundamentals of Physics" by Halliday and Resnick, and "University Physics" by Young, Freedman, and Ford. While Serway is a solid choice, Halliday and Resnick are suggested for their strong problem-solving focus. The Feynman Lectures on Physics are also highly regarded as a supplementary resource, offering a unique perspective that can deepen understanding and appreciation of the subject. It is noted that many calculus-based physics textbooks cover similar material, so if Serway is working well, there may not be a need to switch unless a different style is preferred. The Feynman Lectures, while challenging, are valuable for their engaging approach and can be revisited for deeper insights over time.
MrApex
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
What would you guys say is the best book to self-teach oneself classical physics .. or a few books in conjuction? I am currently using Physics for scientists and engineers by Serway and I am not sure if this is good enough? THanks !
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'd say there are better books out there.

Halliday and Resnick - Fundamentals of Physics

and if you have the big bucks

Young, Freedman, Ford - University Physics

SolsticeFire
 
SolsticeFire said:
I'd say there are better books out there.

Halliday and Resnick - Fundamentals of Physics

and if you have the big bucks

Young, Freedman, Ford - University Physics

SolsticeFire
Do you think I should use these books in conjuction? or use one of the two ( and if so, which one ?) thanks
 
My suggestion would be to use Halliday and Resnick in conjunction with Feynman Lectures on Physics. Halliday and Resnick will develop your problem solving skills while Feynman makes you fall in love with physics :)

SolsticeFire
 
All the commonly-used calculus-based "freshman physics" textbooks cover pretty much the same territory: Halliday/Resnick, Serway, Young/Freedman, Tipler/Mosca, etc. The differences are mainly in writing style, minor variations in sequence of topics, etc. If you already have Serway, I wouldn't plunk down money for another one unless you become unhappy with its style and you inspect another book and decide it suits you better.

The three-volume Feynman Lectures are different enough that they're well worth having as a supplement. Just remember, they were originally for a class of freshman at Caltech, and even they found it somewhat rough going! But grad students and professors kept slipping into the back of the room. :-p So don't expect to catch on to everything the first time through. But if you stick with physics, you'll keep coming back to them.
 
For the following four books, has anyone used them in a course or for self study? Compiler Construction Principles and Practice 1st Edition by Kenneth C Louden Programming Languages Principles and Practices 3rd Edition by Kenneth C Louden, and Kenneth A Lambert Programming Languages 2nd Edition by Allen B Tucker, Robert E Noonan Concepts of Programming Languages 9th Edition by Robert W Sebesta If yes to either, can you share your opinions about your personal experience using them. I...
Hi, I have notice that Ashcroft, Mermin and Wei worked at a revised edition of the original solid state physics book (here). The book, however, seems to be never available. I have also read that the reason is related to some disputes related to copyright. Do you have any further information about it? Did you have the opportunity to get your hands on this revised edition? I am really curious about it, also considering that I am planning to buy the book in the near future... Thanks!
I’ve heard that in some countries (for example, Argentina), the curriculum is structured differently from the typical American program. In the U.S., students usually take a general physics course first, then move on to a textbook like Griffiths, and only encounter Jackson at the graduate level. In contrast, in those countries students go through a general physics course (such as Resnick-Halliday) and then proceed directly to Jackson. If the slower, more gradual approach is considered...

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
8K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Back
Top