Best book (online or print) to learn Linear Algebra?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the search for introductory Linear Algebra books that minimize the emphasis on proofs, focusing instead on practical applications. A recommended resource is "Introduction to Linear Algebra" by Gilbert Strang, which is noted for its accessible approach and relevance to engineering and science. The thread highlights that while some believe proofs complicate learning, they can also provide essential understanding and intuition for others. The conversation suggests a gap in resources that effectively convey concepts without relying heavily on formal proofs. Additionally, engaging with problems and examples alongside proofs is emphasized as a beneficial strategy for deeper comprehension. The author of the thread is also working on creating their own notes to address this need in the educational material for Linear Algebra.
WK95
Messages
139
Reaction score
1
Are there any Introductory Linear Algebra books out there that are not so proof-laden? All those proofs only make things more complicated and I would rather just learn applications of Linear Algebra rather than sit through a bunch of long proofs.

Can anyone suggest some books to me for this? I've searched in Google for PDFs of various Linear Algebra books and documents but most of them also just have loads of proofs. Some "lighter" books have less proofs than others though.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"introduction to linear algebra" by Strang is a nice casual introduction that emphasizes its use in engineering and science. Old editions are fine. For example:

https://www.amazon.com/dp/0961408855/?tag=pfamazon01-20

There are also video lectures of Strang teaching his course out of this book:
http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/mathematics/18-06-linear-algebra-spring-2010/video-lectures/

Note that "linear algebra and its applications" by the same author is a different book, and is less suitable for a first look at the subject (but pretty good for a second informal look).

jason
 
Last edited by a moderator:
All those proofs only make things more complicated

I think you're half right and half wrong. Needless to say, it depends on who is learning it. For people who know how to read proofs, they can actually make things simpler because they can extract the intuition of how things work from the proofs (or more likely by thinking about things on their own). Without that understanding of why things work, the subject can be really meaningless and forgettable. Applications are good, but if you are just learning by rote and taking things on faith, you'll forget it all in 2 seconds.

Really, there should be books that cut out the middle man, that is the proof, and just explain the ideas behind the proofs directly for those who are not adept at reading the proofs (and really, sometimes, even for many of them, because although they will still get most of the intuition if they know what they are doing, it may be filtered and watered down from the overly formal presentation). I'm not aware of a book that really does that consistently for linear algebra (but I'm only familiar with a few of the books). Tends to be either proofs or too much mindless plugging and chugging. I'm working on my own notes for linear algebra that I plan to make available eventually, but it has been slow going because I am too busy with other things. I might try to make videos on put them on youtube or recruit someone else to do the dirty work of writing it up, but eventually, I'll find a way.

Also, it isn't just a matter of reading proofs, even if you know how to do that well. It helps to do problems and examples, along with the proofs--sometimes that will clear the way for understanding the proofs.

Strang got me started, but I really started to understand linear algebra when I took more advanced math classes like real analysis.
 
TL;DR Summary: Book after Sakurai Modern Quantum Physics I am doing a comprehensive reading of sakurai and I have solved every problem from chapters I finished on my own, I will finish the book within 2 weeks and I want to delve into qft and other particle physics related topics, not from summaries but comprehensive books, I will start a graduate program related to cern in 3 months, I alreadily knew some qft but now I want to do it, hence do a good book with good problems in it first...
TLDR: is Blennow "Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering" a good follow-up to Altland "Mathematics for physicists"? Hello everybody, returning to physics after 30-something years, I felt the need to brush up my maths first. It took me 6 months and I'm currently more than half way through the Altland "Mathematics for physicists" book, covering the math for undergraduate studies at the right level of sophystication, most of which I howewer already knew (being an aerospace engineer)...
Back
Top