Best location for a light bulb filament using a concave mirror?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 5K views
reganw
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Where is the best location for a light bulb filament to be placed in a spotlight, when using a concave mirror?

It makes the most sense to put it at the focal point of the mirror if you want parallel light beams but are you supposed to have parallel light beams when you use a spotlight? Or do you want the beams to diverge slightly so the light covers a larger area? I also read that in some slide projectors, the light bulb is placed at the center of curvature.. is this the same thing as radius of curvature? Or are they meaning focal point? I'm just a little unclear..

Thank you in advance for your help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
reganw said:
Where is the best location for a light bulb filament to be placed in a spotlight, when using a concave mirror?

It makes the most sense to put it at the focal point of the mirror if you want parallel light beams but are you supposed to have parallel light beams when you use a spotlight? Or do you want the beams to diverge slightly so the light covers a larger area? I also read that in some slide projectors, the light bulb is placed at the center of curvature.. is this the same thing as radius of curvature? Or are they meaning focal point? I'm just a little unclear..

Thank you in advance for your help!

Don't forget that no light bulb is an actual point source of light, so while some point on the filament may be exactly at the focus, the rest of is will be slightly off, giving a certain amount of spread.

Peter
 
PeterO said:
Don't forget that no light bulb is an actual point source of light, so while some point on the filament may be exactly at the focus, the rest of is will be slightly off, giving a certain amount of spread.

Peter

Spinnor said:

Okay, that's great, thank you to the both of you! I can put together a sufficient answer with all of that info. Thanks again.