Best way to solve Schrodinger's wave equation numerically.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Slide rule
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wave Wave equation
Slide rule
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I have been trying to research the best way to solve the Schrodinger wave equation numerically so that I can plot and animate it in Maple. I'd also like to animate as it is affected by a potential. I have been trying for weeks to do this and I don't feel any closer than when I started. I have looked at finite difference method but I get so far and don't know what to do next.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

The sort of thing I'm looking for is like in this presentation on youtube, especially at 11s leading onto something like the animation at 13s.

http://m.youtube.com/watch?hl=en-GB&client=mv-google&gl=GB&v=Xj9PdeY64rA&fulldescription=1

Thanks you very much
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you give more detail? What is the Hamiltonian? In how many dimensions?

And there is no link to the YouTube video.
 
Hi, sorry for not posting the link, I was very tired when making this post, definitely an oversight on my part. I will be able to post the link in just over an hour.

With regards to dimensions in would only be in 1 dimension along x. Regarding the hamiltonian I am trying to solve the equation as
i x hbar x diff(psi, t) = -(hbar^2)/2m x diff(psi, x$2) + V(x) x psi
where psi = psi(x, t).

Thank you for replying.
 
Since your potential is time independent, the fastest way to solve your problem is to first find the eigenfunctions of the Hamiltonian
<br /> H \phi_i = E_i \phi_i<br />
To do this, discretize space and write the Hamiltonian as a matrix. As you said, you can use a finite difference approximation for the momentum operator.

Once you have the \phi_i, find the initial coefficients of your wave function in this basis,
<br /> \psi(x,t=0) = \sum_i c_i \phi_i(x)<br />
by calculating
<br /> c_i = \int \phi_i^*(x) \psi(x,t=0) dx<br />

Then, the wave function at any time time is simply given by
<br /> \psi(x,t) = \sum_i c_i \phi_i(x) \exp(-i E_i t / \hbar)<br />
By advancing t and refreshing the plot, you will get your animation. I have no idea how to do this in Maple :frown:
 
I have been trying to research the best way to solve the Schrodinger wave equation numerically so that I can plot and animate it in Maple. I'd also like to animate as it is affected by a potential. I have been trying for weeks to do this and I don't feel any closer than when I started. I have looked at finite difference method but I get so far and don't know what to do next.
Slide rule, Why not ask this question over on the Diff Eq forum.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Back
Top