Best way to teach myself differential forms?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around self-teaching methods for differential forms, including recommendations for online courses, books, and video resources. Participants explore various educational materials suitable for different backgrounds and goals, particularly in the context of physics and engineering.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest online courses or videos as potential resources for learning differential forms.
  • Several books are recommended, including Flanders' book and a recent book by Tristan Needham, which some participants find well-written.
  • Participants mention the importance of knowing one's background and goals to tailor the learning approach effectively.
  • One participant highlights the value of Ted Shifrin's notes for being hands-on and example-heavy, which may help beginners navigate abstract concepts.
  • There are discussions about the relevance of William Burke's work and his advocacy for moving beyond traditional vector calculus, with references to his published ideas on differential forms.
  • Some participants express interest in differential geometry texts suitable for beginners, with multiple suggestions provided.
  • Links to various YouTube videos and online resources are shared, indicating a variety of multimedia learning options available.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on a single best method or resource for learning differential forms, as multiple competing views and recommendations are presented throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying levels of familiarity with differential forms and related mathematical concepts, indicating a range of assumptions about prior knowledge and learning objectives.

  • #31
MichaelBack12 said:
Do you think I need an analysis course before reading either book?
Not really. Topology is more needed than hard analysis. I believe the Tu book has an appendix, though, that should be sufficient.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: atyy, fresh_42, vanhees71 and 1 other person
  • #33
mathwonk said:
here is another free set of lectures from a mathematician who tried to present forms to his undergraduates in an unsophisticated way:

https://www.math.purdue.edu/~arapura/preprints/diffforms.pdf
When I saw the name of the author I expected to is an intro to differential forms in algebraic geometry, but it is actually a nice introduction to differential forms for someone with basic calculus knowledge.
 
  • #34
well, (cough, cough) algebraic geometers are famous for knowing everything.:rolleyes:
(maybe make that needing to know.)
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: atyy, fresh_42 and martinbn
  • #35
mathwonk said:
well, (cough, cough) algebraic geometers are famous for knowing everything.:rolleyes:
(maybe make that needing to know.)
So, what Mumford said in the preface of his Curves and Their Jacobians book was not a joke.
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: atyy and jedishrfu

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K