Other Better Supervisor or preferred field?

AI Thread Summary
Choosing a master's field of study presents a dilemma between pursuing a preferred area, theoretical quantum computing, under a less competent supervisor, or opting for a respected theorist in supersymmetry. The discussion emphasizes the importance of mentorship and the potential benefits of working with a strong supervisor, suggesting that the experience and skills gained could lead to a more successful academic career. Engaging with a respected expert may provide valuable insights and techniques applicable to quantum computing in the future. Conversely, the weak reputation of the quantum computing program raises concerns about the quality of education and support, which could lead to frustration and hinder academic progress. Ultimately, prioritizing a strong supervisor appears to be a strategic choice for long-term success.
Emmanouil
Messages
5
Reaction score
1
I am attempting to choose a field of study for my masters course following my undergraduate course however due to the circumstances of the researchers I have to choose between a better supervisor or a preferred field of study; my ideal field would be theoretical quantum computing, however the head researcher at my university in this field is not particularly strong in the field (I have heard from previous students that the program was not very strong). On the other hand I can choose to do theory with a highly respected theoretician in his field (supersymmetry) and get a sort of boot camp experience as well as a (hopefully) strong thesis so that I may apply to a stronger college in the field. Does the second option make any sense from previous experiences? Thanks in advance!
 
  • Like
Likes jedishrfu
Physics news on Phys.org
An interesting dilemma, I think you should consider the theoretical quantum computing as a future course of study and go with the highly respected theoretician.

Why? because you will clearly learn a lot from working under him/her and it will place you on a path to greater success. You might even learn some math/physics techniques that can apply to the QC field later on.

In contrast, if the QC researcher is as weak as you say then you will be learning it more on your own and while being interesting you might not get what you want out of it and ultimately will get frustrated.
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Back
Top