Better Textbook than Lamarsh for Nuclear Engineering

AI Thread Summary
Lamarsh's "Introduction to Nuclear Engineering" is frequently recommended as an introductory text, but some readers find its approach confusing, particularly in the derivation of equations that often rely on specific units or include unnecessary formulas. This has led to calls for clearer alternatives. One suggested replacement is "Fundamentals of Nuclear Science and Engineering" by J. Kenneth Shultis, noted for its clarity. While some critiques exist regarding Lamarsh's book, it is acknowledged that it still has value for learners.
pierce15
Messages
313
Reaction score
2
I browsed this forum a while ago and saw that several people recommend Lamarsh's Introduction to Nuclear Engineering as an intro to this field. I have read about half of this book and really don't like it. Some of the equations are derived in confusing/roundabout ways. For example, many formulas are derived which only work with particular units plugged in. Other times, unnecessary equations are added in derivations. I am wondering if anyone has a similar experience and if they can recommend a textbook more clear in explaining things (for example, Griffiths's physics textbooks).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Fundamentals of Nuclear Science and Engineering by J. Kenneth Shultis is a good option, and its not very confusing. But I should add that Lamarsh is not that bad.
 

Thread 'Opinions/personal experiences on the following four CompSci books'

For the following four books, has anyone used them in a course or for self study? Compiler Construction Principles and Practice 1st Edition by Kenneth C Louden Programming Languages Principles and Practices 3rd Edition by Kenneth C Louden, and Kenneth A Lambert Programming Languages 2nd Edition by Allen B Tucker, Robert E Noonan Concepts of Programming Languages 9th Edition by Robert W Sebesta If yes to either, can you share your opinions about your personal experience using them. I...
View full post »

Thread 'Ashcroft and Mermin: revised edition'

Hi, I have notice that Ashcroft, Mermin and Wei worked at a revised edition of the original solid state physics book (here). The book, however, seems to be never available. I have also read that the reason is related to some disputes related to copyright. Do you have any further information about it? Did you have the opportunity to get your hands on this revised edition? I am really curious about it, also considering that I am planning to buy the book in the near future... Thanks!
View full post »

Thread 'How is Jackson’s Electrodynamics taught during undergraduate?'

I’ve heard that in some countries (for example, Argentina), the curriculum is structured differently from the typical American program. In the U.S., students usually take a general physics course first, then move on to a textbook like Griffiths, and only encounter Jackson at the graduate level. In contrast, in those countries students go through a general physics course (such as Resnick-Halliday) and then proceed directly to Jackson. If the slower, more gradual approach is considered...
View full post »

Similar threads

Nuclear Looking for Nuclear Engineering must reads
Replies
5
Views
2K
Quantum Recommended Textbooks for Quantum Field Theory and Antiparticles
Replies
4
Views
2K
Intro Physics Starting fresh, but where to start?
Replies
5
Views
1K
I A question I have about my L.A. textbook (2)
Replies
6
Views
2K
Efficient Study Tips for Physics, Math, and Engineering Subjects
Replies
5
Views
4K
What Historical Math Textbooks Offer Unique Insights?
Replies
5
Views
5K
Looking for a good textbook/book
Replies
4
Views
6K
Yet Another Request for a Textbook Recommendation
Replies
6
Views
5K
Algebra/Trignometry based Physics textbooks
Replies
1
Views
5K
Are Recent Students All Google Crazy?
Replies
19
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top