Betz Limit Applied to hydro turbine?

AI Thread Summary
The Betz limit, which applies to wind turbines, does not directly apply to hydro turbines due to their different operational principles. Hydro turbines utilize gravitational potential energy from falling water, allowing them to achieve efficiencies exceeding 85%, unlike the 60% limit for wind turbines. The discussion highlights that certain systems, like those with a significant elevation drop or specialized designs such as venturi systems, can exceed traditional efficiency expectations. The Ludington Pumped Storage Power Plant exemplifies high efficiency in hydro systems, achieving around 80% round trip efficiency. Overall, hydro turbines operate under different physical principles, allowing for greater energy conversion efficiencies.
rmm5
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Just wondering if the Betz limit is applicable to hydro turbines or if there is some analogous limit for hydro turbines?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This article claims that water turbines can exceed the Betz limit (for windmills) with the proper venturi.
http://www.freeenergynews.com/Direc...Technical_Report_on_Davidson-Hill_turbine.pdf
I can also see that a penstock with a large elevation drop will also exceed the Betz limit (about 60% for HAWT wind turbines). As a matter of fact, the pumped water storage system at Ludington, Michigan has about a 80% round trip efficiency. See
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ludington_Pumped_Storage_Power_Plant
Bob S
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The Betz limit commonly applies to wind turbines and to underwater turbines which are made to turn by the bulk movement of water (e.g. tidal power). This theoretical efficiency limit is around 60%, where at most 60% of the wind (or water) kinetic energy is converted to mechanical energy in the rotor.

Hydro turbines are different, in that they use gravitational potential energy of falling water to turn turbines. The physics is different in that the water is channeled into the turbine, but for a wind turbine you have the blades spinning in open air, or in the case of an underwater turbine, open water. This is why hydro turbines (in particular Francis turbines), can reach higher efficiencies, more than 85%.

That's the word explanation. I'm sure there's a more rigorous mathematical way of proving it, but off the top of my head I don't know of one.


rmm5 said:
Just wondering if the Betz limit is applicable to hydro turbines or if there is some analogous limit for hydro turbines?
 
Thanks for the info.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Back
Top