Bicycle & Motorcycle Turning Dynamics: Leaning to Balance Forces

  • Thread starter Thread starter sganesh88
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Turning
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the mechanics of turning a bicycle and the role of leaning. It emphasizes that leaning is essential for balancing forces during a turn, specifically gravitational and inertial forces, rather than merely keeping the rider on the bike. The conversation highlights that turning involves countersteering, where turning the handlebars initiates a lean that allows for a coordinated turn. It clarifies that a bike turns by applying forces through the tires against the pavement, which creates inward acceleration. Ultimately, proper technique is crucial for effective turning, as improper leaning can lead to loss of control.
sganesh88
Messages
286
Reaction score
0
The wikipedia article on "Bicycle and motorcycle dynamics" in the "Turning" section
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bicycle_and_motorcycle_dynamics#Turning
states
In order to turn, that is, change their direction of forward travel, bikes must lean to balance the relevant forces: gravitational, inertial, frictional, and ground support.

Is this right? I think leaning is done for the rider staying on the bike. (balancing the moment of the friction and the moment of the normal force about the C.G) and not for initiating the turn. comments?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So, how are you suggesting that turns are made? Do you think by turning the handlebars? Go try it - try to turn the bars right, and you will lean over to the left and turn left (as long as you are moving with some speed). If you don't believe this please go try it before replying.
 
So, how are you suggesting that turns are made?
So there is no need of friction? Just a torque contributed by the normal force is enough? Those silly guys are unnecessarily providing handle bars then. God forgive them!
 
A bike turns (the center of mass accelerates "inwards"), when ever the tires apply an outwards force to the pavement, which coexists with an equal and opposite inwards force onto the tires. The force produces an inwards acceleration and rolling torque on a bicycle. If the bicycle isn't leaned sufficiently for gravity related torques to counter the steering related torques, the bicycle will roll outwards. Note that the rate of inwards acceleration is equal to the inwards force from the pavement divided by the mass of the bicycle, regardless of any roll reaction.

Normally the goal is to not fall over, so a somewhat "coordinated" turn is needed, and countersteering, either directly through steering inputs, or body leaning, which results in a brief outwards steering of the front tire is needed in order to initiate the roll to achieve a proper lean. Note that body leaning only works within a speed range.

gmax137 said:
Turn the bars right, and you will lean over to the left and turn left.
Not quite. Turn the bars right, and the bicycle will turn right while rolling left, ending up on it's left side, but having turned right in the process. The side force determines the rate of inwards acceleration, independent of any roll reaction of the bicycle, the caveat here is to note that for a given steering input, the side force will be less if the bicycle experiences outwards roll axis acceleration than if the turn is properly coordinated (or inwards roll axis acceleration).

Then again, it's difficult to turn a bicycle that is sliding on its side after falling over.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top