Bicycle rider down a hill (Dynamics)

AI Thread Summary
A bicycle rider descends a hill, starting with an initial velocity and rolling freely down a circular path. The discussion focuses on calculating the speed at the bottom of the hill and the reaction force acting on the bike. Energy conservation principles are applied, with potential energy at the top equating to kinetic energy at the bottom. A participant corrected their calculations by ensuring velocity values were squared, resulting in a final speed of 18.19 m/s. The consensus is that using energy conservation simplifies the problem compared to directly analyzing forces.
Femme_physics
Gold Member
Messages
2,548
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



http://img822.imageshack.us/img822/5347/byccc.jpg

A bicycle rider starts his motion from the top of the hill A at an initial velocity (Vo). From that point, the bicycle roll freely (without using pedals) in a the circular path.

A) Calculate the speed of the rider at bottom point B
B) Calculate the reaction force (N) acting on the bike at point B

Comment: Ignore friction and presume the rider is a point mass.

(The rest of the info is in the pic I uploaded)


The Attempt at a Solution



Again, getting weird/impossible outcomes


http://img94.imageshack.us/img94/324/fyfyasdasdasda.jpg

http://img690.imageshack.us/img690/927/trigg.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the Potential Energy at the top of the hill?
What is the Kinetic Energy at the top of the hill?

What is the Potential Energy at the bottom of the hill?
What is the Kinetic Energy at the bottom of the hill?

Set up Energy Equation:

(Total energy at top of Hill) = (Total energy at bottom of hill)

Try setting the potential energy at the bottom of the hill as zero and see what you get...

You can have the whole equation set up in one line...
 
Working out the forces in this instance, though it can be done... might lead to ulcers.
 
Perhaps you could check your formula table?
I seem to be missing a few squares?! :confused:
 
yeah, Femme_Physics - In the second image, you've calculated the final speed of the bike using energy conservation, but both of those velocities in the equation should be squared. Which is why it comes out with the wrong answer.
Once you get the right value for velocity, you can calculate the required centripetal force. And this will equal N-W because these forces are both in a radial direction when the cyclist is at the bottom of the circle
 
Okay, I did it with squared values and I got the correct answer.

Vb = 18.19 m/s

As far as N goes...piece a cake :)

http://img849.imageshack.us/img849/94/nnnasdas.jpg

Working out the forces in this instance, though it can be done... might lead to ulcers.
Really?
How could it be possibly easier to solve it with energy? This was pretty facile if you ask me! :)

Thanks, everyone!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top