Big Bang: How Did the Energy Get There?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chrono
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Big bang Energy
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the origins of the Big Bang and the energy that initiated it, questioning how energy can exist if it cannot be created or destroyed. Participants acknowledge that the cause of the Big Bang remains unknown, with theories like string theory and the concept of multiverses being explored. There is debate over whether energy conservation laws apply during the universe's creation, with some suggesting that matter and antimatter were produced in equal amounts but that a slight imbalance favored matter. The conversation highlights the complexities of quantum theory and the challenges in understanding the universe's beginnings. Ultimately, the quest for a definitive explanation of the Big Bang continues, with no widely accepted scientific theory yet established.
Chrono
Messages
424
Reaction score
3
The Big Bang was basically caused by an extreme heating up of energy, right? Well, how did that energy get there if it can neither be created or destroyed?

This question is assuming I have my facts straight.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I think nobody nows what caused the big bang, or if there has only been one. And your remark about the conservation of energy; this 'rule' might be created along with the big bang itself... We're not nearly yet at the point of understanding of the beginning of the universe as we would like...
 
The first day of creation, who could ACT rationally on such a morning?
Aleksandr Isaevich Solzhenitsyn
 
The Big Bang might have started from a white hole, which would assumes multiverses.
 
The answer might lie in string theory, saying that it is possible for high tension strings to produce high energy and continue to produce heavy mass, much heavier than the standard model of particles and then decay into particles we study today. Though it's just a theory and I don't know how the first string came about. Also, with a slight energy fluctuation matter and anti-matter can be created, with enough energy (more anti-matter), a matter/anti-matter colision could possibly form other mass and so on and so forth. But I've found all these theories confusing because quantum theory always seems to turn things around. But it's just some stuff I've read.

-Energy conservation laws would probably breakdown in creation of a universe wouldn't they?
 
energy conservation laws may not break down in the creation of the universe. i think the current theory is that matter and antimatter were created in equal parts, but the antimatter had a slightly shorter decay rate, so there was a slightly higher abundance of matter left over after all the matter/antimatter anihilated.
 
Here is an interesting link dating back 10^-44 seconds before the big bang:
http://perry.sonoma.edu/journeys/cb/Default.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Chrono - As was said, the cause of the Big Bang is unknown, although there are some interesting ideas being considered (e.g., string theory, etc.). But, alas, no well supported scientific theory to explain the Big Bang source.

matt.o - There's a possible zero-sum game if you add up the positive & negative aspects of matter, energy, dark matter, dark energy, & gravity in the universe (all balances out). Check out ...
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=58558
 
Last edited:
The concept of a universe from nothing has a certain appeal. There are other mechanisms proposed that rely upon a pre existing state [strings, branes, previous universes] but, if you extrapolate these backwards as well, you still face the ultimate question: where did the very first something come from? To say they have existed forever is, at least to me, not very satisfying, but I suppose that is a matter of taste. Much has been written on the topic:

A Universe from Nothing
http://www.astrosociety.org/pubs/mercury/31_02/nothing.html
An old standby article

Simple quantum cosmology: Vacuum energy and initial state
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0501014
The most recent technical paper
 
Last edited:
  • #10
Phobos said:
Chrono - As was said, the cause of the Big Bang is unknown, although there are some interesting ideas being considered (e.g., string theory, etc.). But, alas, no well supported scientific theory to explain the Big Bang source.

That's pretty much what I was looking for.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
193
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
1K
Back
Top