Big Bang Theory: Spacetime or Matter First?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter omie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matter Spacetime
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between spacetime and matter in the context of the Big Bang Theory. Participants clarify that quantum fields, which include fundamental particles and large masses, existed prior to the end of inflation but were in a vacuum state. The process known as "reheating" transferred energy to these fields, enabling their formation. The need for a unified theory of quantum gravity is emphasized, as it may provide insights into the fundamental nature of spacetime and matter.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Big Bang Theory
  • Familiarity with quantum field theory
  • Knowledge of the Standard Model of particle physics
  • Concept of cosmic inflation and reheating
NEXT STEPS
  • Research quantum gravity theories and their implications
  • Explore the concept of cosmic inflation in detail
  • Study the Standard Model of particle physics
  • Investigate the process of reheating in the early universe
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, cosmologists, and anyone interested in the fundamental principles of the universe, particularly those exploring the origins of spacetime and matter.

omie
Messages
4
Reaction score
2
My question comes from the following confusing aspect of the big bang theory. Since at different stages during development of the current universe, we know that fundamental particles, atoms and large masses started to form. And if all large masses are embedded in spacetime when during the development of the universe did the spacetime form? . But it seems to me, that all aspects of matter, would require a spacetime. It is not only large masses that depend on the spacetime but even small particles. Meaning if you require to create a universe the foundation of it must consist of something super strong. Or that space time was always there, and all the mass was just compacted into a point. Am i being silly?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
omie said:
at different stages during development of the current universe, we know that fundamental particles, atoms and large masses started to form.

Careful. The quantum fields of the Standard Model, which is what "fundamental particles, atoms, and large masses" are all built on, were always there. But before the end of inflation, those fields had no energy in them; they were all in their vacuum state. At the end of inflation, the energy stored in the inflaton field was transferred to the Standard Model fields (this process is called "reheating", which is somewhat of a misnomer since there had been no previous "heating" or "unheating"). But that didn't create those fields; it just transferred energy to them.

omie said:
it seems to me, that all aspects of matter, would require a spacetime

More precisely, quantum fields such as those in the Standard Model require a background spacetime to exist. At least, that's how quantum field theory is currently formulated. One reason why physicists are searching for a theory of quantum gravity is to try to find a theory in which spacetime and quantum fields are both aspects of something more fundamental. We probably won't be able to answer questions like "how did the universe ultimately originate?" until we have such a theory.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K