Binned threads: Scepticism forum

  • Thread starter Thread starter J77
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
A thread discussing a claim about a hacker accessing US military information on UFOs was deleted, raising questions about forum rules. The original poster noted the source was credible, referencing a BBC article, but acknowledged the story's speculative nature. Forum guidelines emphasize that while exploration of unexplained phenomena is welcome, conspiracy theories should not be discussed without verifiable evidence. The moderator clarified that duplicate threads can lead to deletions and encouraged users to reach out for clarification when their posts are removed. A zero-point warning system will be implemented to address confusion regarding posting rules.
J77
Messages
1,092
Reaction score
1
I wouldn't normally ask about deleted threads but PF has no bin...

I couldn't find anything in the rules about why my thread on the English guy who said he hacked his way into the US military and found info on UFOs got deleted.

I understand that the story was a bit 'out there' but the source was credible, ie. the bbc: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/4757375.stm

And I did put it in the Scepticism forum.

Did it break any forum rules? (Generally interested for future reference.)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The relevant sections from the S&D guidelines are:
In order to help avoid confusion it seems appropriate to state the goal of S&D clearly: We explore claims of and evidence for unexplained phenomena. Thoughtful speculation and explanations are welcome.

and
Although unavoidably linked with subjects such as UFOs, we do not discuss conspiracy theories for their own sake.

Just because it's a conspiracy theory proposed by a hacker who has gotten mainstream publicity doesn't make his claim credible, and even if he's being truthful of what he thinks he saw, it certainly isn't verifiable or subject to debunking.

If that's not sufficient explanation, you'll need to contact Ivan via PM for any more clarification about specifics of your post.
 
Thanks MB, that sounds good to me. :biggrin:

Hi J77,
there was also another thread about this below your post, which I had already closed. What happens is that people don't see the closed threads, and pretty soon we have two, three, or even four closed threads on the same story if I don't just delete them.

Anytime something like this happens, you or anyone else should feel free to send a pm asking why your thread was deleted. But as a rule, unless you get a warning, you are safe to assume that either the content was innappropriate for the forum, or someone has already started a parallel thread and you just missed it.
 
Last edited:
Cool :smile:

Thanks for the replies - I didn't see the closed thread when I posted mine, even though I searched the boards for "hacker".

:cool:
 
Okay, what I'll do is issue a zero point warning containing a short statement of the problem. This should help to prevent confusion. A warning of zero points carries no penalty.

We'll also be adding a posting agreement to ensure that everyone sees and understands the posting guidelines.
 
Last edited:
I want to thank those members who interacted with me a couple of years ago in two Optics Forum threads. They were @Drakkith, @hutchphd, @Gleb1964, and @KAHR-Alpha. I had something I wanted the scientific community to know and slipped a new idea in against the rules. Thank you also to @berkeman for suggesting paths to meet with academia. Anyway, I finally got a paper on the same matter as discussed in those forum threads, the fat lens model, got it peer-reviewed, and IJRAP...
About 20 years ago, in my mid-30s (and with a BA in economics and a master's in business), I started taking night classes in physics hoping to eventually earn the science degree I'd always wanted but never pursued. I found physics forums and used it to ask questions I was unable to get answered from my textbooks or class lectures. Unfortunately, work and life got in the way and I never got further the freshman courses. Well, here it is 20 years later. I'm in my mid-50s now, and in a...

Similar threads

Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
26
Views
3K
Back
Top