How Can the Binomial Theorem Be Derived from Discrete Math Concepts?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Enjoicube
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Binomial Discrete
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the derivation of the binomial theorem from discrete math concepts, particularly through combinatorial identities related to powersets. It highlights that the size of the powerset of a set S with n elements can be expressed as both 2^n and the sum of binomial coefficients, leading to the identity ∑(n choose i) = 2^n. The inquiry focuses on how to transition from this identity to the generalized form of the binomial theorem, ∑(n choose i)x^(n-i)y^i = (x+y)^n. While induction is suggested as a method to prove the identity, the main question remains how to derive the second expression from the first. The discussion emphasizes the need for clarity on the steps involved in this derivation.
Enjoicube
Messages
48
Reaction score
1
Ok, so after a little discussion with my discrete math teacher today, he sent me on a little "quest". Here is how it happened:

The topic we were covering was set theory, and as I had been studying very basic combinatorics the night before, I noticed something about the powerset, namely:

Assuming a set S with n elements:

|P(S)|=2^n

however, if S has n elements, and the powerset is compose of S's subsets, then:

|P(S)|= C(n,0)+C(n,1)...+C(n,n)

so

C(n,0)+C(n,1)...+C(n,n)=2^n

so

\sum^{n}_{i=0}(\stackrel{n}{i})=2^n

I asked about this after class, and he said the binomial theorem could be derived through this identity, I sort of see how, but I doubt the corectness of these ways. Does anybody know about a way to go about this?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If you mean how to prove this identity, induction would do a fine job.
 
I guess what I really meant was, is there any step you can see that can be taken to get from:

\sum^{n}_{i=0}\left(\stackrel{n}{i}\right)=2^n

to

\sum^{n}_{i=0}\left(\stackrel{n}{i}\right)x^{n-i}*y^{i}=(x+y)^{n}
 
The other way is easy: let x= y= 1. I don't see how, just from the first, you can get to the second: the second contains "more information" than the first.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top