Binomial Expansion: Solve for L=Hbar*(l+1/2)

  • Thread starter Thread starter perplexabot
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Binomial Expansion
perplexabot
Gold Member
Messages
328
Reaction score
5
Hey all. I have posted a thread regarding this question a while back. I did get an answer and everything. (Here is my old post along with the original question if you are interested: https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=592885).

So i tried doing that problem again like this:

Given:
L = Hbar * √(l*(l+1))
Binomial expansion approximation: (1+z)^n = 1 + nz

My try:
L = Hbar * √l * (1 + l/2)

If you opened the link of my previous post you will see that I must obtain L = Hbar * (l + 1/2). As you can see my just calculated expression is not the same as the previous expression, however plugging in a certain value of l, one obtains the same value for either expression which leads me to believe the two expressions are equivalent. So my question is: How would I play with my current equation to obtain the equation from the previous post. Yes, this is completely an algebra question. Thank you.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm going to call your lower-case l capital L because l looks like 1.

Hbar * √(L*(L+1)) is not equal to Hbar * √L * (1 + L/2), if that is what you are claiming? To see this, just plug in L = 1. Then the first expression becomes hbar*sqrt(2) while the second becomes hbar * (3/2).

Nor is Hbar * √L * (1 + L/2) equal to Hbar * (L + 1/2), if that is what you are claiming. Just plug in L = 2; then the first expression is hbar * sqrt(2) * 2 while the second is hbar * 5/2.
 
Oh, i made a stupid mistake i guess. Thank you for your correction. Can you explain why the two equations are not equivalent? I got both of them from the same equation but they are not equal.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top