Biological/DNA ComputingYour thoughts?

  • Thread starter Thread starter StarkyDee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Thoughts
AI Thread Summary
The future of computing is increasingly leaning towards biological computing, particularly for large-scale problems like genetic and biological testing. However, challenges exist, such as the difficulty in altering programming, the unconventional power sources required, and the one-time use nature of biological components. Concerns about memory reliability in biological systems have been raised, highlighting that human memory can become corrupted over time, which may affect data storage in biological mediums. While medical applications show promise for biological computing, the issues of non-reusability and the potential for corruption of biological materials remain significant hurdles. Despite these challenges, the concept of organic machines is viewed as potentially superior to traditional electronic systems.
StarkyDee
Here is the future of computing whether you like it or not! Here is a site that gives a great summary of what is in the future for computers. After reading this I would like to hear your comments on the topic..I hope this thread will become a real kicker))

http://www.uhisrc.com/FTB/BioComputing/FTBBioComp.pdf
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
From the way I see it biological computing makes sense when you are doing large scale problems repetitivly like genetic/biological testing but otherwise it becomes problematic. You cannot change the programing easily, it doesn't use a "neat" power source (electricity vs. ?) and as I understand it it is not reusable really but more of a one use thing. It may replace some electronics but I don't see how it is a viable option for replaceing the pc.
 
I recently read an article in the Fortean Times that may suggest that there would be trouble with memory as well. The article briefly discussed a study recently run on human memory that showed our old memories that are not often accessed tend to become corrupted and our brains alter them as we attepmt to fill in the lost information upon accessing them again. So as far as memory is concerned a biological medium may be to dynamic to retain information reliably unless you want to write and rewrite genetic coding for the purpose of information storage and even then who knows.
 
So I have finished reading that paper. Thinking about it I probably should have done so first before commenting, or at least that would have been more logical. It's very interesting what they are doing and it seems like the medical aplication is it's best market. I don't see though how they can overcome the non-reusable aspect without creating a living processor such as the Donovans Brain scenario that was discussed. Even then though I think there would still be trouble with the expiration and corruption of the biological matter. At the same time in support of the idea I have always thought that organic machines would be far superior to nuts and bolts.
 
Sorry if 'Profile Badge' is not the correct term. I have an MS 365 subscription and I've noticed on my Word documents the small circle with my initials in it is sometimes different in colour document to document (it's the circle at the top right of the doc, that, when you hover over it it tells you you're signed in; if you click on it you get a bit more info). Last night I had four docs with a red circle, one with blue. When I closed the blue and opened it again it was red. Today I have 3...
Thread 'ChatGPT Examples, Good and Bad'
I've been experimenting with ChatGPT. Some results are good, some very very bad. I think examples can help expose the properties of this AI. Maybe you can post some of your favorite examples and tell us what they reveal about the properties of this AI. (I had problems with copy/paste of text and formatting, so I'm posting my examples as screen shots. That is a promising start. :smile: But then I provided values V=1, R1=1, R2=2, R3=3 and asked for the value of I. At first, it said...
Back
Top