Biotech vs Biomedicine: Which One to Choose?

  • Thread starter Thread starter moonknight94
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the choice between pursuing a degree in biotechnology or biomedicine, with participants exploring the implications of each field on career prospects, educational pathways, and job market conditions. The conversation includes considerations of related fields such as chemical engineering and general biology.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that biotechnology and biomedicine are broad terms and recommend considering specific programs or starting with a general biology degree to maintain flexibility.
  • One participant argues that chemical engineering (ChemE) offers better employment prospects compared to biomedical sciences, citing a challenging job market in the latter field.
  • Another participant agrees about the difficulties in biomedical careers, particularly in academia, highlighting the prevalence of low-paying postdoctoral positions and a competitive job market.
  • Some participants mention that ChemE graduates are primarily employed in oil & gas, pharmaceuticals, environmental firms, and manufacturing, but express uncertainty about the overall job market for chemical engineers.
  • There is a discussion about the necessity of obtaining a PhD for a career in biology, with concerns raised about the scarcity of academic positions and low salaries for postdocs in life sciences.
  • One participant seeks information about the best colleges for biology programs and labs, indicating a desire for guidance on educational institutions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the employment prospects of chemical engineering versus biomedical sciences, with some agreeing on the challenges in academia while others emphasize the potential of ChemE. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best path forward for the original poster.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in job market data and the variability of employment opportunities across different sectors, particularly in relation to economic cycles affecting the oil & gas industry and the hiring practices of pharmaceutical firms.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals considering a career in biology, biotechnology, biomedicine, or chemical engineering, as well as students exploring undergraduate programs in these fields.

moonknight94
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
So I want to get into biology question is which one? Either biotech or biomedicine. Which one would you choose and why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Those are fairly broad terms. Are you deciding between two specific programs? If so, it might help to summarize the details of each.

If you're interested in biology, start out with a general biology degree in undergrad. I would avoid specializing too much. With a more general program you have the option of pursuing the courses that interest you the most without locking yourself into one direction or another too early. You make the decision to specialize when it's time to go to graduate school and in that case you can make the decision about what field to pursue by the specific problems you're interested in working on along with some weight on the career outlooks associated with pursuing those problems.
 
Chemical engineering. ChemE is a much more employable degree than anything related to bio or biomedical sciences. If you want to pursue blog later you still can with a ChemE degree.

There are many, many scientists, these days, including myself, that have gotten burned by biomedical science in terms of jobs, employment, and general overall outlook. It is simply not a healthy career for the long foreseeable future. Academia is also quite bad. The sequester doesn't really sink in until it hits your lab. The PIs in this department are the best in the world at a top rated institution. If they're struggling to keep on the lights for many of their labs, it has to be 10x worse at other schools and departments. Many Phds in biomedical sciences, If they choose to stay in academia, will be relegated to a never ending gig of low paying post docs, holding out hope for an academia position that doesn't exist or one that will literally have 300 applicants.
 
gravenewworld said:
Chemical engineering. ChemE is a much more employable degree than anything related to bio or biomedical sciences. If you want to pursue blog later you still can with a ChemE degree.

There are many, many scientists, these days, including myself, that have gotten burned by biomedical science in terms of jobs, employment, and general overall outlook. It is simply not a healthy career for the long foreseeable future. Academia is also quite bad. The sequester doesn't really sink in until it hits your lab. The PIs in this department are the best in the world at a top rated institution. If they're struggling to keep on the lights for many of their labs, it has to be 10x worse at other schools and departments. Many Phds in biomedical sciences, If they choose to stay in academia, will be relegated to a never ending gig of low paying post docs, holding out hope for an academia position that doesn't exist or one that will literally have 300 applicants.

I agree with you about the research environment, either in pharma or in academia, but disagree with you about employment prospects with respect to chemical engineering.

The thing about chemical engineering is that the only employers that I can think of that hire them are the following:

(1) oil & gas companies
(2) pharmaceutical firms
(3) environmental firms/organizations (including waste water management)
(4) possibly those in materials science

(1) is currently booming now, but is subject to severe boom/bust cycles.
(2), as far as I know, is not hiring that many chem engineers, and positions are subject to outsourcing.
Neither (3) or (4) is hiring that many chemical engineers.

To the OP:

If you are intent on pursuing a biology degree, I would follow Choppy's advice and not specialize too much in your undergraduate study. A general biology is a good introductory background to pursue future studies in medicine, nursing, dentistry, veterinary medicine or (if combined with studies in chemistry), pharmacy. All of these fields are currently in major demand and provide stable employment.
 
This page is a great resource if your are considering a career in biology.

http://ns.msu.edu/index.php/students/career/career-exploration/careers-for-biological-sciences-majors/
 
This helps a lot, thank you every one!
 
StatGuy2000 said:
The thing about chemical engineering is that the only employers that I can think of that hire them are the following:

(1) oil & gas companies
(2) pharmaceutical firms
(3) environmental firms/organizations (including waste water management)
(4) possibly those in materials science

ChemEs are widely employed in manufacturing. Chemical engineering overlaps with manufacturing engineering and process engineering. You can find details for the US here. Other countries should have similar employment statistics.
 
If you intend to get a career in biology, you will need a PhD. Keep in mind however, jobs in academia are even more scarce, and life science postdocs have among the lowest salaries for postdocs in general.

While we're on the subject - how active is research in Chemical Engineering? How do chemE's with PhDs fare, and where can they find employment?
 
Thank you for the info! :) now one last question which college has the best biology programs/labs?
 
  • #10
Ben Espen said:
ChemEs are widely employed in manufacturing. Chemical engineering overlaps with manufacturing engineering and process engineering. You can find details for the US here. Other countries should have similar employment statistics.

Ben, you are right, I forgot to include chemical industries and pulp & paper firms (I included gasoline, synthetic rubber and plastics under oil & gas, since those products are manufactured based on petroleum).

As far as the BLS numbers below, I recognize that chemical engineers earn a very high salary. However, it's not certain if the employers of chemical engineers are hiring that many new people (or whether there are new opening for such positions) outside of the oil & gas sector. So my basic point still stands.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
8K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
8K