News BITCOIN, Heists, Thefts, Hacks, Scams, and Losses

  • Thread starter Thread starter nsaspook
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bitcoin
Click For Summary
The discussion highlights significant security issues surrounding Bitcoin exchanges, particularly focusing on the infamous Mt. Gox, which suffered a major theft leading to its bankruptcy. The exchange's management ignored critical warnings about its software's security flaws, resulting in millions lost and a tarnished reputation for Bitcoin. Other exchanges like Flexcoin and Canadian Bitcoins also reported substantial losses due to hacks and social engineering attacks. The conversation underscores the ongoing risks associated with Bitcoin transactions and the need for improved security measures in the cryptocurrency space. Overall, these incidents illustrate the vulnerabilities within the Bitcoin ecosystem that can lead to significant financial losses for users.
  • #541
Rive said:
knowingly handling dirty money
Right.,..but who is to say the money is dirty? That's a whole 'nother prosecution. "You can't argue that I should have known if you, with the full power and authroity of the federal government, can't prove it yourself." is an argument that juries can sympathize with.

This is even one step removed when the activity was all in the Bahamas.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #542
Vanadium 50 said:
Right.,..but who is to say the money is dirty?
Might be one really difficult and long case, sure. Yet, this one alone may stick - stick enough so a deal could be a tempting offer.
We'll see.
 
Last edited:
  • #543
https://www.cnbc.com/2022/12/13/us-...ud-securities-fraud-and-money-laundering.html

Sam Bankman-Fried criminal charges unsealed: Conspiracy to defraud the U.S., wire fraud, securities fraud, and money laundering​

Civil charges
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/complaints/2022/comp-pr2022-219.pdf
COMPLAINT
Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”), for its complaint
against Defendant, Samuel Bankman-Fried (“Bankman-Fried”), alleges as follows:
SUMMARY
1. From at least May 2019 through November 2022, Bankman-Fried engaged in a
scheme to defraud equity investors in FTX Trading Ltd. (“FTX”), the crypto asset trading
platform of which he was CEO and co-founder, at the same time that he was also defrauding the
platform’s customers. Bankman-Fried raised more than $1.8 billion from investors, including
U.S. investors, who bought an equity stake in FTX believing that FTX had appropriate controls
and risk management measures. Unbeknownst to those investors (and to FTX’s trading
customers), Bankman-Fried was orchestrating a massive, years-long fraud, diverting billions of
dollars of the trading platform’s customer funds for his own personal benefit and to help grow
his crypto empire.
...
5. But Bankman-Fried did not stop there. Even as it was increasingly clear that
Alameda and FTX could not make customers whole, Bankman-Fried continued to
misappropriate FTX customer funds. Through the summer of 2022, he directed hundreds of
millions more in FTX customer funds to Alameda, which he then used for additional venture
investments and for “loans” to himself and other FTX executives. All the while, he continued to
make misleading statements to investors about FTX’s financial condition and risk management.
Even in November 2022, faced with billions of dollars in customer withdrawal demands that
FTX could not fulfill, Bankman-Fried misled investors from whom he needed money to plug a
multi-billion-dollar hole. His brazen, multi-year scheme finally came to an end when FTX,
Alameda, and their tangled web of affiliated entities filed for bankruptcy on November 11, 2022.
32. Bankman-Fried diverted FTX customer funds to Alameda in essentially two
ways: (1) by directing FTX customers to deposit fiat currency (e.g., U.S. Dollars) into bank
accounts controlled by Alameda; and (2) by enabling Alameda to draw down from a virtually
limitless “line of credit” at FTX, which was funded by FTX customer assets.
33. As a result, there was no meaningful distinction between FTX customer funds and
Alameda’s own funds. Bankman-Fried thus gave Alameda carte blanche to use FTX customer
assets for its own trading operations and for whatever other purposes Bankman-Fried saw fit. In essence, Bankman-Fried placed billions of dollars of FTX customer funds into Alameda. He
then used Alameda as his personal piggy bank to buy luxury condominiums, support political
campaigns, and make private investments, among other uses. None of this was disclosed to FTX equity investors or to the platform’s trading customers.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes artis, Astronuc, Vanadium 50 and 1 other person
  • #544
https://www.axios.com/2022/12/13/sam-bankman-fried-criminal-fraud-money-laundering
Criminal charges.
https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/23450583/sam-bankman-fried-indictment.pdf
1670964187941.png
 
  • #545
Just a summary
Bankman-Fried was charged with eight criminal counts, including conspiracy and wire fraud, earlier in the day, for allegedly misusing billions of dollars in customer funds to prop up his Alameda Research crypto fund. Bankman-Fried was arrested Monday in the Bahamas, where he was living.
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/bankman-fried-ftx-fraud-probe-193135904.html
Up to 20 years per count.

(Reuters) - In mid-2020, FTX's chief engineer made a secret change to the cryptocurrency exchange’s software.

He tweaked the code to exempt Alameda Research, a hedge fund owned by FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried, from a feature on the trading platform that would have automatically sold off Alameda's assets if it was losing too much borrowed money.

In a note explaining the change, the engineer, Nishad Singh, . . . .
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/exclusive-secret-software-change-allowed-205742135.html
The exemption allowed Alameda to keep borrowing funds from FTX irrespective of the value of the collateral securing those loans. That tweak in the code got the attention of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, . . .
I presume the tweak in the code will be used to show 'intent', in conjunction with the transfer of customer funds.
 
  • #546
Sounds like somebody has been a very bad boy.
 
  • Sad
  • Haha
Likes artis and nsaspook
  • #547
He had the means motive and opportunity to flee to Cuba. Like Ghislaine Maxwell could be living the high life in Paris. (French citizens cannot be extradited). Surely
he was aware of the crimes, as outlined above. Therefore he has to be delusional to carry on as if he is untouchable.
 
  • #548

New FTX CEO: ‘This is old-fashioned embezzlement’​

 
  • #549
morrobay said:
He had the means motive and opportunity to flee to Cuba. Like Ghislaine Maxwell could be living the high life in Paris. (French citizens cannot be extradited). Surely
he was aware of the crimes, as outlined above. Therefore he has to be delusional to carry on as if he is untouchable.
But Ghislaine Maxwell as far as I know isn't living the "high life" in Paris, she is instead sentenced to 20 years in prison. Given she is 60 that is pretty much for life.
She is in prison now.
https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/p...son-conspiring-jeffrey-epstein-sexually-abuse
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
  • #550
So basically the picture I now have of SBF is this.

Guy uses tricks and the crypto boom to make investors and clients deposit their actual worth something fiat currency in his exchange , in exchange he gives them the pretty much worthless experiment of a currency crypto and uses their real fiat currency to back up his pockets and plans through his backdoor company.
As long as crypto's booming no one notices but then when crypto faces the problems it should have long before faced , all of a sudden turns out his just another guy who lived on debt and now can't repay...

So his life achievement is that he was smarter than others who live on debt so he managed to live better while acquiring bigger debt.So the morale of the story is this, if you simply wish to have what you can't buy - take a loan if they give you one, but if you wish to have all of the things in the world that you can't buy - create a crypto exchange and defraud your investors....
Definitely not original.
 
  • Like
Likes Astronuc and russ_watters
  • #552
(Bloomberg) -- Sam Bankman-Fried’s trading house Alameda Research had a secret speed advantage when executing orders on his now-collapsed FTX crypto exchange, according to the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

Alameda, which also tumbled into bankruptcy last month along with FTX, was able to skirt certain portions of the exchange’s trading architecture and sidestep some automated verification processes, the CFTC said in a complaint filed Tuesday in Manhattan federal court.
https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/ftx-systems-gave-alameda-trades-055134191.html

SBF has a heapin' helpin' of trouble.
 
  • #553
morrobay said:
Understood: Just saying they both coulda, shoulda, woulda.
Not that I worry about it, but are you saying that you wish for a large scale thief to get away from the consequences of his actions?Although I agree if I was him and realized that I'm about to get at least 10 years behind bars I would probably take a route B after my massive crypto defrauding scheme goes bust.
The question is why he isn't running , is it because he suddenly has become a devout christian and is willing to pay for his sins or the more likely option that maybe he thought till the very end that he could somehow clean up this mess and save his name to a degree. But if that's the case I have to say his very naive. I have a hard time believing a man who managed to get so far even with thievery and questionable intent can be so naive.
I guess time will answer these puzzles.
 
  • #554
artis said:
The question is why he isn't running
He's under arrest.

More damning information
https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/ftx-executives-used-korea-account-214446326.html
(Bloomberg) -- A GitHub account bearing the name of former FTX executive Nishad Singh authored code that hid Alameda Research’s ballooning liabilities on the now-collapsed cryptocurrency exchange, according to internal documentation reviewed by Bloomberg News.

The documentation, in the form of comments associated with specific lines of code, offers clues to the origins of a mysterious account on FTX that a regulator alleges helped mask mounting debts of its sister trading firm Alameda Research. The relationship between the two firms, and alleged misuse of FTX customer funds, led to criminal charges against founder Sam Bankman-Fried.
. . .
The code and available information could be used to show intent.
 
  • #556
A new horror series:
1671126431441.png
 
  • Like
Likes collinsmark and Bystander
  • #557
Astronuc said:
He's under arrest.
That is only for the last couple of days. He was free for like a month after FTX filed for bankruptcy and given he knew what he was doing and where it was all heading I'd say he was well aware of the possible outcome at least a month prior to that , so at least two months. I mean plenty of time.
 
  • #558
artis said:
Not that I worry about it, but are you saying that you wish for a large scale thief to get away from the consequences of his actions?
That isn't how I read @morrobay 's post, at all.
 
  • #560
gmax137 said:
That isn't how I read @morrobay 's post, at all.
I might have got the wrong impression that's why I asked.
 
  • #561
artis said:
That is only for the last couple of days. He was free for like a month after FTX filed for bankruptcy and given he knew what he was doing and where it was all heading I'd say he was well aware of the possible outcome at least a month prior to that , so at least two months. I mean plenty of time.
It's not clear that SBF knew the severity of the situation, kind of like he didn't bother to keep thorough accounting records. There was initially a rumor that SBF took a flight to S. America, perhaps Argentina, or somewhere in the neighborhood. Perhaps Bahamian authorities told him not to go anywhere, and perhaps he thought he could explain his way out of the situation, and recover. I don't know.

Then again, where would he go? With those kind of losses, if another country tried to shield him, that country might find itself on the receiving end of sanctions and disconnection from the global banking system.
BWV said:
Sam Bankman-Fried just lost 90+% of his net worth and his company, FTX

Sam Bankman-Fried’s $16 Billion Fortune Is Eviscerated in Days
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...iscerated-in-days-with-binance-set-to-buy-ftx
Well, that certainly blew up!
 
Last edited:
  • #562
re: Will SBF face prison time (and/or other punishment)

https://www.huffpost.com/highline/article/white-collar-crime/

Read ^^^ this recent HuffPost article on white collar crime and then rethink.

It's rare for super wealthy/powerful people to get harsh sentencing. And even if they do, once they are locked up and the media has shifted the spotlight away from them, their high-powered lawyers start negotiating reduced sentencing and they often get out of prison MUCH FASTER than expected (again, when "no one is looking"...). See examples in article.

Some of the stories in there will sicken you. . .we live in an unfair world. I tend to think SBF gets off relatively easier when all is said and done.
 
  • #563
kyphysics said:
re: Will SBF face prison time (and/or other punishment)

https://www.huffpost.com/highline/article/white-collar-crime/

Read ^^^ this recent HuffPost article on white collar crime and then rethink.

It's rare for super wealthy/powerful people to get harsh sentencing. And even if they do, once they are locked up and the media has shifted the spotlight away from them, their high-powered lawyers start negotiating reduced sentencing and they often get out of prison MUCH FASTER than expected (again, when "no one is looking"...). See examples in article.

Some of the stories in there will sicken you. . .we live in an unfair world. I tend to think SBF gets off relatively easier when all is said and done.

Remember though, he isn't wealthy anymore!
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes artis, russ_watters and nsaspook
  • #564
artis said:
That is only for the last couple of days. He was free for like a month after FTX filed for bankruptcy and given he knew what he was doing and where it was all heading I'd say he was well aware of the possible outcome at least a month prior to that , so at least two months. I mean plenty of time.
I for sure want to see him extradited and processed in a U.S. court. But from his position it would have been easy to have made "arrangements" for a fast boat to Cuba and join the U.S.fugitive crowd there. It seems Cuba could care less what the U.S. thinks with a history of taking fugitives.
IMG_20221216_140716_1.jpg
 
  • #565
Astronuc said:
It's not clear that SBF knew the severity of the situation, kind of like he didn't bother to keep thorough accounting records.
Much about him is rather strange from the outfits to the financial dealings, at this point it's even hard to say whether it's all a clever show or not.

Someone should ask him whether the millions paid to democrats were actually worth it , because judging by the looks of it it did not help him much, if anything.
And he definitely did not pay them out of pure love and care for US politics.
 
  • #566
artis said:
Much about him is rather strange from the outfits to the financial dealings, at this point it's even hard to say whether it's all a clever show or not.

I agree here. The whole thing is confusing.
artis said:
Someone should ask him whether the millions paid to democrats were actually worth it , because judging by the looks of it it did not help him much, if anything.
And he definitely did not pay them out of pure love and care for US politics.

He's young, his parents are college professors, he grew up in California, he probably is a liberal? If your goal is purely to opportunistically bribe someone in exchange for political protection when bad things come out, he didn't pick the right party (not that i think the Republicans would have helped him in any way either). He also didn't pick the right election, mostly he donated to the primaries and then skipped the general election (probably because the money issues started becoming more apparent is my speculation)

Also, none of that was actually his money, so the cost to him was very small. It's not like they'll upgrade the felony charge because he stole 3.02 billion dollars instead of just 3 billion dollars. If that extra money could have stopped ftx from collapsing when it did then it would have been an expensive decision, but it seems like he really needed to not steal any money for that to work given how bad it ended.
 
  • #567
Mazars, the accounting firm that issued a proof of reserves report posted by cryptocurrency giant Binance last week, has pulled the report from its website and no longer offers the service for its crypto clients.
https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/accounting-firm-issued-proof-reserves-223433840.html
"Mazars has paused its activity relating to the provision of Proof of Reserves Reports for entities in the cryptocurrency sector due to concerns regarding the way these reports are understood by the public," the accounting group said in an emailed statement to Fox Business.

I wonder if it is really a matter of not believing the report's accuracy.
 
  • #568
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...of-cash-to-plead-guilty-in-bitcoin-theft-case
1671308931775.png
Ohio Man Who Posed in Tub Full of Cash to Plead Guilty in Bitcoin Theft Case
Prosecutors had seized the wallet from Harmon’s brother, Larry, after his February 2020 arrest on charges he laundered $311 million in crypto transactions on Darknet sites where illegal drugs were sold. Larry Harmon was the first person charged with US crimes related to “mixing” — the practice of jumbling together tokens from different owners to make them harder to trace.
 
  • #569
Office_Shredder said:
I agree here. The whole thing is confusing.He's young, his parents are college professors, he grew up in California, he probably is a liberal? If your goal is purely to opportunistically bribe someone in exchange for political protection when bad things come out, he didn't pick the right party (not that i think the Republicans would have helped him in any way either). He also didn't pick the right election, mostly he donated to the primaries and then skipped the general election (probably because the money issues started becoming more apparent is my speculation)
Now it is revealed that he donated to lawmakers who were on committees that would be investigating him.
https://freebeacon.com/democrats/ba...to-house-committee-members-investigating-him/