Solving a DC Circuit: Find I_B, V_C, V_{CE}

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on solving a DC circuit to find the base current (I_B), collector voltage (V_C), and collector-emitter voltage (V_{CE}). The user derived equations for I_B and V_C but found discrepancies with the provided answers, specifically I_B = 0.0995 mA, V_C = 12.8 V, and V_{CE} = 8.76 V. The confusion arose from not accounting for the emitter's potential due to the emitter resistor, which affects the calculations of I_B and I_E. The correct approach involves applying Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL) and understanding the relationship between I_C, I_B, and I_E in the circuit.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of DC circuit analysis
  • Familiarity with Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL)
  • Knowledge of transistor operation, specifically bipolar junction transistors (BJTs)
  • Ability to manipulate and solve simultaneous equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL) in transistor circuits
  • Learn about the relationship between collector current (I_C), base current (I_B), and emitter current (I_E) in BJTs
  • Explore the impact of emitter resistor on transistor biasing and calculations
  • Practice solving DC circuits with varying configurations and component values
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineering students, circuit designers, and anyone involved in analyzing or designing transistor-based circuits will benefit from this discussion.

STEMucator
Homework Helper
Messages
2,076
Reaction score
140

Homework Statement



Screen Shot 2015-04-12 at 10.50.51 AM.png


For the circuit above, draw the DC equivalent circuit.

Then compute ##I_B, V_C, V_{CE}##.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



So the DC equivalent circuit was easy to draw. My concern is about the final answer. The answer given does not match the answer I've obtained and I'm wondering who is correct.

After drawing the DC circuit, I obtained the following relationships:

$$I_C = \frac{V_{CC} - V_C}{R_C} = \frac{21 - V_C}{2k}$$
$$I_B = \frac{V_C - V_{BE}}{R_1 + R_2} = \frac{V_C - 0.7}{81k}$$
$$I_E = \frac{V_E}{R_E} = \frac{V_E}{1k}$$

Now we know ##I_C = \beta I_B##, so the first and second equations can be related:

$$40I_B = \frac{21 - V_C}{2k}$$
$$I_B = \frac{V_C - 0.7}{81k}$$

Simplifying we get:

$$I_B = \frac{21 - V_C}{80k}$$
$$I_B = \frac{V_C - 0.7}{81k}$$

Solving we get:

$$\frac{21 - V_C}{80k} = \frac{V_C - 0.7}{81k}$$
$$V_C = 10.9V$$

Going back to the original equations, we see:

$$I_C = \frac{21 - V_C}{2k} = \frac{21 - 10.9}{2k} = 5.05 mA$$
$$I_B = \frac{V_C - 0.7}{81k} = \frac{10.9 - 0.7}{81k} = 0. 126 mA$$

Then we know:

$$I_E = I_C + I_B = 5.05 mA + 0.126 mA = 5.176 mA$$

From which we find:

$$I_E = \frac{V_E}{1k}$$
$$V_E = (5.176 mA)(1k) = 5.176 V$$

Hence we know:

$$V_{CE} = V_C - V_E = 10.9V - 5.176V = 5.72V$$

Now all of my analysis seems reasonable to me, but for some reason the answer is given:

$$I_B = 0.0995 mA$$
$$V_C = 12.8 V$$
$$V_{CE} = 8.76 V$$

This answer does not match mine whatsoever. Have I done something wrong?

EDIT: Here is a picture of the analysis given in the answer:

Screen Shot 2015-04-12 at 11.17.22 AM.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This doesn't look right:
Zondrina said:
$$I_B = \frac{V_C - V_{BE}}{R_1 + R_2} = \frac{V_C - 0.7}{81k}$$

I didn't check the rest. I think the solution you were given is correct.

You have the two equations in three unknowns ##I_C = \beta I_B,I_C + I_B = I_E##, so find a third using KVL and your knowledge of ##V_\mathrm{BE}##.
 
When you calculated IB you did not take into account the fact that the emitter is not at ground potential, but has some potential VE due to the emitter resistor carrying current (IB and IC).Edit: Oops! Beaten to the punch by milesyoung!
 
So I have the two equations:

$$I_C = \beta I_B$$
$$I_E = I_C + I_B$$

That connection from the collector to the base is what's causing a little bit of confusion. Why do they write ##I_C + I_B = I_E## in the spot where usually they write ##I_C##? In other words, why are they saying ##I_E## flows through ##R_C##? If I understood this, then everything else is clear.
 
Zondrina said:
Why do they write ##I_C + I_B = I_E## in the spot where usually they write ##I_C##?
Consider where the base current comes from in this circuit compared to the ones you're used to.

Maybe think of it this way: The emitter current flows down through ##R_C##, splits into ##I_B## and ##I_C##, and then forms up as ##I_E## again through ##R_E##.
 
Maybe a picture to help?

Fig1.gif
 
I see how I'm supposed to think about the current "breaking up" now. Pictures are worth a million words.

Thank you so much to both of you. That one connection threw me off my usual thinking. So:

$$-21V + I_ER_C + I_B(R_1 + R_2) + 0.7V + I_ER_E = 0$$
$$I_ER_C + I_B(R_1 + R_2) + I_ER_E = 20.3V$$

Then using ##I_E = (\beta + 1)I_B##:

$$I_B(R_1 + R_2) + (\beta + 1)I_B(R_C + R_E) = 20.3V$$

The rest of the analysis follows.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
5K