Plotting ##I_C## vs. ##V_{CE}## for Resistors in Active Region

  • Thread starter Thread starter STEMucator
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Plotting Resistors
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around plotting the collector current ##I_C## versus the collector-emitter voltage ##V_{CE}## for a transistor circuit in the active region. Participants are exploring the selection of resistor values, particularly ##R_C, R_B,## and ##R_1##, while addressing the constraints imposed by the circuit design and the operational characteristics of the transistor.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant outlines the initial approach to determine resistor values, calculating ##R_C## based on the desired collector current and voltage conditions.
  • Another participant questions the feasibility of maintaining a constant ##I_C## while varying ##R_C##, suggesting that the listed equations may not represent fundamental properties of the setup.
  • There is a discussion about the assumptions made regarding the currents through the resistors, particularly the condition ##I_{R1} = 10 I_B##, with some participants arguing for the necessity of higher currents to avoid issues in the analysis.
  • Participants express confusion over the choice of the midpoint for the collector voltage and its implications for maximizing output voltage swing.
  • One participant proposes that a larger current through ##R_1## could be beneficial, while another suggests that the choice of current should be more flexible than the initial assumption of a factor of 10 greater than ##I_B##.
  • There is a suggestion to choose multiple values for ##R_C## to explore different operating conditions, including both active and saturation regions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the optimal values for the resistors or the assumptions underlying the circuit design. Multiple competing views remain regarding the necessary conditions for the analysis and the implications of varying resistor values.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in their analysis, including the dependence on specific assumptions about current ratios and the need for clarity in the definitions of operational parameters. The discussion reflects uncertainty about the implications of these assumptions on the overall circuit behavior.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students and practitioners involved in circuit design, particularly those working with transistor amplifiers and seeking to understand the relationships between current and voltage in active regions.

STEMucator
Homework Helper
Messages
2,076
Reaction score
140

Homework Statement



I want to plot ##I_C## versus ##V_{CE}## curves for the following:

Screen Shot 2015-09-20 at 10.15.56 AM.png


To do so, I need to find appropriate values for ##R_C, R_B## and ##R_1## in the active region.

Note that ##R_2## is a potentiometer.

Homework Equations



##I_C = 1 mA##
##V_{BE} = 0.7 V##
##\beta = 150##
##R_x = R_y = 500 \Omega##
##I_{R1} = 10I_B##
##V_{CEsat} = 0.5 V##.

The Attempt at a Solution



First I need to find appropriate values for the resistors, but I've hit a snag. The analysis proceeds like so:

1) ##v_{Cmax} = V_{CC} = 15V## and ##v_{Cmin} = V_{B} = V_{E} + V_{BE} = 0.7V##.

Therefore ##V_{C} = \frac{1}{2} (15V + 0.7V) = 7.85 V##.

2) ##R_C = \frac{V_{CC} - V_C}{I_C} = \frac{15V - 7.85V}{1 mA} = 7.15 k \Omega##.

This ##R_C## produces a ##V_{CE} > 0.5 V##, so we are in active mode.

3) Now that we have ##R_C##, we need to find ##R_B## and ##R_1##. Let ##I_B = \frac{I_C}{\beta} = \frac{1 mA}{150} = 6.68 \mu A##.

Then ##I_{R1} = 10I_B = 66.8 \mu A##. This will be the current flowing across the series combination of ##R_1## and ##R_x##.

Now ##I_{Ry} = I_{R1} - I_{B} = 60.12 \mu A##. This will be the current flowing across ##R_y##.

4) Here is where I start encountering results that don't add up. I want to find the voltage at the node between ##R_1 + R_x##, ##R_B## and ##R_y## (call it ##V_{BB}##), so I used:

$$\frac{V_{BB} - 0}{500 \Omega} = 60.12 \mu A \Rightarrow V_{BB} = 0.03 V$$

This result makes no sense because the voltage at the base is ##0.7V##.

What went wrong here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your analysis is confusing me.
Zondrina said:
I want to plot ##I_C## versus ##V_{CE}## curves for the following:
Okay. In the remaining post you fix ##I_C = 1 mA##, how can you measure different values then?

Homework Equations


[...]
##R_x = R_y = 500 \Omega##
##I_{R1} = 10I_B##
You want to design your circuit with those additional constraints? Listing them as "relevant equations" makes them look like some fundamental properties of the setup. This is a crucial point because those assumptions break your analysis later.
1) ##v_{Cmax} = V_{CC} = 15V## and ##v_{Cmin} = V_{B} = V_{E} + V_{BE} = 0.7V##.

Therefore ##V_{C} = \frac{1}{2} (15V + 0.7V) = 7.85 V##.
Why?
This ##R_C## produces a ##V_{CE} > 0.5 V##, so we are in active mode.
By construction, sure.

4) Here is where I start encountering results that don't add up. I want to find the voltage at the node between ##R_1 + R_x##, ##R_B## and ##R_y## (call it ##V_{BB}##), so I used:

$$\frac{V_{BB} - 0}{500 \Omega} = 60.12 \mu A \Rightarrow V_{BB} = 0.03 V$$

This result makes no sense because the voltage at the base is ##0.7V##.
This tells you you need more current flowing through the resistors (##I_{R1} > 10I_B##), or larger resistors.
 
mfb said:
Okay. In the remaining post you fix IC=1mAI_C = 1 mA, how can you measure different values then?


I will be varying the value of ##R_C## during the experiment, and I will be adjusting the potentiometer so it produces ##I_C = 1mA## at all times.

I'm not measuring ##I_C##. When I plot ##I_C## versus ##V_{CE}## the curves will represent ##I_B##.

mfb said:
You want to design your circuit with those additional constraints? Listing them as "relevant equations" makes them look like some fundamental properties of the setup. This is a crucial point because those assumptions break your analysis later.

I was told to set ##R_x = R_y = 500 \Omega##. Usually we are told to make the assumption ##I_{R1} = 10 I_B##.

mfb said:
Why?

This is due to the regions of operation of the transistor. For example, in cutoff we can observe ##V_C = V_{CC} = 15 V##.

mfb said:
This tells you you need more current flowing through the resistors (IR1>10IBI_{R1} > 10I_B), or larger resistors.


This would be much different than the usual assumption I'm told to make.
 
Zondrina said:
I was told to set ##R_x = R_y = 500 \Omega##. Usually we are told to make the assumption ##I_{R1} = 10 I_B##.
Well, that does not work, as you can see. A larger current in R1 does not harm. Only a smaller one could lead to problems.

This is due to the regions of operation of the transistor. For example, in cutoff we can observe ##V_C = V_{CC} = 15 V##.
Sure, but why do you choose exactly the middle of the range as working point?
 
mfb said:
Sure, but why do you choose exactly the middle of the range as working point?

I'm trying to maximize the output voltage swing.

Here is the original problem statement just in case it might help:

For this section, you will generate a plot similar to Figure 1.2 by plotting IC vs VCE. The figure shows several curves for different IB values. You will produce one curve at a single constant IB value that gives IC in the active region around 1 mA.

R2 is a potentiometer (the symbol is a resistor with an arrow pointing to it). It is a 3-terminal variable voltage divider with a total resistance of 1k. This allows the base voltage to be tuned by fine increments. Thus, Rx+Ry will always be equal to 1k, but the value of Rx can be changed from 0 to 1k by turning the dial.

For this part, determine appropriate values of R1, RB and RC. You will need to justify these choices in
your report with good reasons. Obviously there will be many possible values of RC, with each representing a different VCE. Choose at least 10 values in the active region and another 5 or more values in the saturation region. Show the expected VCE for each resistance.

As a hint, for these calculations, keep in mind that VBE is around 0.7 V in the active region, VCE,sat is 0.5V, beta is around 150 and that the voltage drop across any resistor should be at least 0.25 V to be able to measure it accurately. In addition, the current flowing in the left branch should be much greater than the base current and the potentiometer should be in its middle range (i.e. Rx=Ry=500 ohms).
 
"Much greater". A factor of 10 is much greater, but a factor of several hundred is "much greater" as well. There is no reason to use 10. You can work backwards: choose Rb to satisfy the 0.25 V condition, find the voltage at the connection point, then determine the current you need in Ry to match that voltage.

Zondrina said:
I'm trying to maximize the output voltage swing.
Looking at the full problem statement, you'll need several different values for the resistor anyway.
 
mfb said:
"Much greater".

Yes this was not very specific at all. Would you suggest ##I_{R1} = 1000 I_B## or something along those lines? If so the voltage would be about ##3.3V## at ##V_{BB}## and the rest of the analysis would follow.

Then I would choose 10 values of ##R_C## such that ##V_{CE} > 0.5 V## and 5 values of ##R_C## such that ##V_{CE} \leq 0.5 V##.

Sound good?
 
Sounds good.
If you choose the current a bit smaller than that your base current can be adjusted in finer steps.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: STEMucator

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K