BJT single stage amplifier we write gm=Ic/VT

  • Thread starter Thread starter pforpashya
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Amplifier Bjt
AI Thread Summary
In a BJT single stage amplifier, the transconductance (gm) is defined as Ic/VT, with VT being the thermal voltage of approximately 26mV. For a Darlington pair configuration, the overall gm is calculated using the combined thermal voltage of 52mV, as there are two forward active PN junctions. Each transistor's gm is determined by its own collector current divided by its respective VT. The small signal gain for a common emitter amplifier can be expressed using the parameters of both transistors in the Darlington pair. Understanding the inclusion of the Boltzmann constant in VT calculations is essential for accurate thermal voltage representation.
pforpashya
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
For BJT single stage amplifier we write gm=Ic/VT where VT is Thermal voltage whose value is 26mv. Now if we have a Darlington pair i.e. two transistor connected in CC-CC mode what will be overall gm.

Will the collector current Ic be divided by 52mv or 26mv. (Because in gain equation gm comes)

as their are two forward active PN junctions ...the cumulative change in VT is 52mV?

is this correct?

can someone through light on "why we have to include Boltzmann constant in calculation of VT"
in simple words?

Thanks in advance
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Each device has gm value equal to its own Ic divided by VT, where VT is 25.7 mV for each device. For a Darlington, if the input device is no. 1, and output device is no. 2, then Ie1 = Ib2, Ic1 = α1*Ie1, Ic2 = β2*Ib2, or Ic2 = α2*Ie2, .

This should get you started.

Claude
 
Last edited:
ok. thank you for your reply. to find overall gm (i.e. gm2 as gm1 of first pair in darlington is very small) of the device should i divide Ic2 by VT1+VT2 i.e. 52mV?
 
Yes you should use 2*Vt if you want to find voltage gain.

The small signal gain for CE amplifier is equal to

\Large \frac{Vout}{Vin} =-\frac{Rc (\beta 1+\beta 2+\beta 1 \beta 2)}{(1+\beta 1) (re1+re2+re2 \beta 2)}

Where

re1 ≈ 1/gm1
re2 ≈ 1/gm2
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thanks alot...I have to solve one unsolved problem on darlington pair before saturday. I hope i will get right answer as i have to just multiply gm by output resistance of darlington pair.
 
can someone through light on "why we have to include Boltzmann constant in calculation of VT"
in simple words?
 
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
Thread 'Beauty of old electrical and measuring things, etc.'
Even as a kid, I saw beauty in old devices. That made me want to understand how they worked. I had lots of old things that I keep and now reviving. Old things need to work to see the beauty. Here's what I've done so far. Two views of the gadgets shelves and my small work space: Here's a close up look at the meters, gauges and other measuring things: This is what I think of as surface-mount electrical components and wiring. The components are very old and shows how...

Similar threads

Back
Top