Could Black Holes Be Collapsed Dimensions Rather Than Massive Gravity Events?

  • Thread starter Thread starter edsousaphone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    2d Blackhole
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the idea that black holes may result from collapsed dimensions rather than massive gravity events. It suggests that the event horizon could be shredding three-dimensional objects, contributing to the universe's expansion and the formation of galaxies. The potential correlation between the spiral structure of galaxies and black hole dynamics is also considered, likening it to the growth rings of a conch shell. However, participants challenge these ideas, emphasizing the lack of scientific backing and suggesting that black holes are better understood as collapsed mass. The conversation highlights the need for more evidence and clarity in understanding black hole mechanics.
edsousaphone
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Greetings all,

Is it possible that black holes are the result of collapsed dimension as opposed to huge mass/gravity events? Perhaps, the event horizon is shredding 3d objects and creating new space expanding the universe and forming the stuff of the galaxy around them. Could the curve of a spiral galaxy show that expansion in the outward growth of each arm of the spiral. Additionally, could the spin and mass of the black hole be determined by unwinding the growth of a spire like the growth rings of a conch shell.

like 270 degrees of rotation over 10 billion years, approximate length of spire, and some estimate of mass in a set of concentric circles in 1 billion year increments from outer edge of the black hole.

Just a starting point, but if the sample size were large enough more specific data could be gleaned.

I could see a constant for spin, no dimension for light to cross, and a loss of acceleration and mass that comes from depth of travel to the core of a black hole.

Thanks,
edsousaphone
 
Space news on Phys.org
Hi edsousaphone, welcome to PF!

None of your post has any scientific backing, sorry.
edsousaphone said:
Is it possible that black holes are the result of collapsed dimension as opposed to huge mass/gravity events? Perhaps, the event horizon is shredding 3d objects and creating new space expanding the universe and forming the stuff of the galaxy around them.
What evidence is there for any aspect of that? Wouldn't it be better for black holes to just be collapsed mass? ---It would certainly make General Relativity classes easier.

edsousaphone said:
Could the curve of a spiral galaxy show that expansion in the outward growth of each arm of the spiral. Additionally, could the spin and mass of the black hole be determined by unwinding the growth of a spire like the growth rings of a conch shell.
No. The spirals are formed (and evolve) by hydrodynamic effects.

edsousaphone said:
I could see a constant for spin, no dimension for light to cross, and a loss of acceleration and mass that comes from depth of travel to the core of a black hole.
What?
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top