Black Hole Event Horizon: Is There a Physical Boundary?

ChrisVer
Science Advisor
Messages
3,372
Reaction score
465
Is there a physical boundary that is the event horizon? Or is there not?
The reason I'm asking is because texts say that the event horizon that appears in Schwarzschild's metric is a result of the coordinate choice, and it disappears by choosing some other coordinates.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ChrisVer said:
The reason I'm asking is because texts say that the event horizon that appears in Schwarzschild's metric is a result of the coordinate choice, and it disappears by choosing some other coordinates.
I think what they say is that the singularity at the EH exists only in some coordinates.
 
  • Like
Likes ChrisVer
ChrisVer said:
Is there a physical boundary that is the event horizon? Or is there not?
The reason I'm asking is because texts say that the event horizon that appears in Schwarzschild's metric is a result of the coordinate choice, and it disappears by choosing some other coordinates.

The singularity at the horizon is a result of coordinate choice (you can make it go away by choosing, for example, Kruskal coordinates) but the physical significance of the event horizon is not. The event horizon is a light-like surface, and "physical boundary" is not an especially natural term for describing it, but it is a well-defined surface in the Schwarzschild spacetime as long as you use coordinates that aren't singular there.
 
  • Like
Likes bcrowell and ChrisVer
ChrisVer said:
The reason I'm asking is because texts say that the event horizon that appears in Schwarzschild's metric is a result of the coordinate choice, and it disappears by choosing some other coordinates.

I have never encountered a text that says this.
 
George Jones said:
I have never encountered a text that says this.

That's a coordinate singularity. It exists due to the choice of coordinates, and can be resolved by a more appropriate choice of coords.
 
At risk of putting words in George's mouth, I think he's pointing out that a coordinate choice doesn't remove the event horizon, which is a co-ordinate independent surface. You can remove the coordinate singularity at the event horizon by careful choice of coordinates, but the horizon remains.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...

Similar threads

Back
Top