Black Holes & Hawking Radiation: Time Paused in Gravity?

Abishek
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
In the view of Hawking radiation and entropy of black holes, the evaporation is continuous and at one point, there will be no singularity for the black hole. By relativity, if we reach a super massive black hole, then time would be relatively slowed down to a point that it stops (maybe?). Now, if there is no "time" for occurrence of Hawking radiation, then how does it actually occur? Even if it did occur, then will it not be a very slow process?

P.S: I am ready for the stabs of cruel physics professors now...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The formulas are calculated for time as seen by an observer far away - for large black holes, it is a very slow process because the temperature is tiny, but for small black holes it is fast.
 
To expand just slightly on mfb's response, what he has pointed out indirectly is that LOCALLY, at the position of the black hole, time passes normally, it does not slow down much less stop.
 
It's hard to visualize...
 
Abishek said:
It's hard to visualize...
We humans have evolved in an INCREDIBLY limited range of physical phenomena so there are TONS of things in cosmology (the very large) and quantum mechanics (the very small) that we find "hard to visualize" (and a lot of it just flat hard to believe).
 
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
Thread 'Relativity of simultaneity in actuality'
I’m attaching two figures from the book, Basic concepts in relativity and QT, by Resnick and Halliday. They are describing the relativity of simultaneity from a theoretical pov, which I understand. Basically, the lightning strikes at AA’ and BB’ can be deemed simultaneous either in frame S, in which case they will not be simultaneous in frame S’, and vice versa. Only in one of the frames are the two events simultaneous, but not in both, and this claim of simultaneity can be done by either of...

Similar threads

Back
Top