B Black Holes: Rotating vs Non-Rotating

Souhardya Nandi
Messages
17
Reaction score
3
I am reading about Kerr black holes and non rotating black holes. But I am unable to understand what decides whether the black hole will not rotate or rotate. And if No Hair theorem suggests, we can know about a black hole through its angular momentum, what implications does zero angular momentum have for a black hole ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A Kerr black hole forms from a star with nonzero angular momentum, or from a system of stars with nonzero angular momentum.
 
In the limit of zero angular momentum, the Kerr black hole solution becomes the Schwarzschild black hole solution. In other words a non-rotating Kerr black hole is identical to a Schwarzschild black hole.
 
Souhardya Nandi said:
I am reading about Kerr black holes and non rotating black holes. But I am unable to understand what decides whether the black hole will not rotate or rotate. And if No Hair theorem suggests, we can know about a black hole through its angular momentum, what implications does zero angular momentum have for a black hole ?
Real black holes effectively always rotate. The chance of a black hole not having any angular momentum is pretty much nil.

That said, as a theoretical construct it's easy to consider a black hole that has no angular momentum. Such black holes are much simpler than spinning black holes, lacking features such as the ergosphere or jets. As phyzguy mentions, these are just Schwarzschild black holes which are defined by a single parameter (their mass parameter).
 
  • Like
Likes Daverz
Angular momentum is conserved, so if the star or matter had some angular momentum before collapsing into a black hole, it will become a rotating black hole.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...

Similar threads

Back
Top