Undergrad Bloch Waves within Tight Binding Approximation

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the interpretation of Bloch's theorem and its application within the tight binding approximation. It highlights the distinction between using a continuous plane wave and a discrete phase factor applied to orbitals in unit cells, which affects the density of states and its dependence on the choice of origin. The author seeks clarity on whether these differences are trivial or hold significant physical implications. An example involving a one-dimensional chain of hydrogen atoms illustrates how changing the lattice constant impacts the wavefunction's interpretation without altering its form. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the nuances in understanding Bloch waves in different contexts.
James J
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
So I thought I understood something well, and then I went to explain it to someone and it turns out I'm missing something, and I'd appreciate any insight you might have.
If I think about Bloch's theorem, it states that
ψk(r)=eik⋅ruk(r) where uk has the periodicity of the lattice. If u is independent of wavevector, well then I'm just multiplying some function by a plane wave. Great. The density, which is a physical observable, then is independent of k and each unit cell has the same density ρ(r).

Within the tight binding approximation, however, one typically applies that phase factor discretely to orbitals inside each unit cell. For a single orbital per unit cell, φ, one might write the wave function as ψTB=∑m eikRmφ(r-Rm)

This is distinct from multiplying the sum by a continuous plane wave (ψ=eik⋅Rmφ(r-Rm)) as it introduces nodes in the density ρ(r), and makes the density depend on the choice of origin. Both of these satisfy Bloch's theorem, but they seem physically different. I understand if I work through a simple band structure how ψTB(k) has some advantages for calculating band structures, but am I getting hung up on something unphysical, wrong, trivial, or subtly relevant?

Thanks for any insight,
James
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Maybe a simple example helps here: Think of a one dimensional chain of e.g. hydrogen atoms. You can write down the Bloch wavefunctions immediately. Now you can also chose the lattice constant twice as large as the distance of the atoms. Then the basis will contain two atoms. The wavefunction does not change, only the interpretation. You see that the second atom will be out of phase relative to the first one by exp(ika).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
18K