Blocks in a room which is being accelerated

  • Thread starter Thread starter Like Tony Stark
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Blocks
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the equations of motion for two masses in an accelerating room, focusing on the forces acting on each mass, including pseudo-forces and friction. The derived friction coefficient, μ, was calculated as 0.6, but there are concerns about the correctness of the equations and the sign of the friction. An alternative calculation suggests a different value for μ, specifically 2/3, based on the forces acting on the masses. The choice of vertical direction for the x-axis is noted as unconventional, and there is a suggestion to include intermediate steps for clarity. Overall, the conversation highlights discrepancies in calculations and the need for clearer presentation of the problem-solving process.
Like Tony Stark
Messages
182
Reaction score
6
Homework Statement
The two bodies shown in the picture have the same mass and are inside a room which is accelerating to the right with ##2 \frac{m}{s^2}##. The coefficient of static friction is the same for both bodies. Determine the minimum value of the coefficient of static friction such that the blocks don't slide with respect to the room and the tension.
Relevant Equations
Newton's equations
I wrote the equations for ##m_2## with respect to the room, which are:
##x) T-Fr_1-f_1 *=0##
##y) N_1-P_1=0##

For ##m_1## we hace:
##x) N_2=f_2 *##
##y) T+Fr_2 -P_2=0##

Where ##f*_1## and ##f*_2## are the pseudo-forces and ##Fr_1## and ##Fr_2## are the friction forces that contain ##\mu##

Then I solved for ##\mu## and got ##\mu =0.6##

Are my ideas correct? Because I wasn't sure about the sign of the friction.
 

Attachments

  • 20191004_195022.jpg
    20191004_195022.jpg
    59.1 KB · Views: 231
Physics news on Phys.org
x is in vertical direction? An unconventional choice.
You could have shown the intermediate steps. I get a different answer.

Working purely in the single degree of freedom: m*g is a force towards "m2 goes down", m*a is a force against it (where a=2 m/s^(2)), m*g*μ is against it (friction from m1), m*a*μ is against it (friction from m2).
m(g-a) = mμ(g+a), μ = 8/12 = 2/3.
 
  • Like
Likes Like Tony Stark
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K