Bogoliubov transformation 3-mode

  • Thread starter Thread starter Naibaf
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Transformation
Naibaf
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

I'm working on spin-wave theory and I have a problem with a bogoliubov transformation.
I must do the transformation with 3 bosons and i have no idea how to do it.
I've only found the transformation for 1 and 2-mode bosons, but not for three...

It exist?

Thanks...



And sorry for my english...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Maybe you could provide us with your hamiltonian?
 
The hamiltonian is very long, but the idea is that I have, products of bosons operator, for example: a*a + a*b + a*c + b*b + bb + b*c and so on...

Where a, b an c are boson operators.
As there are "non-diagonal" terms, the idea is use Bogoliubov Transformation for make the hamiltonian a diagonal hamiltonian... But for 2 differents bosons, the tranformation is:

alpha_{k} = cosh(theta_{k}) a_{k} - sinh(theta_{k}) b*_{k}, where b* is b-dagger

ans this transformation is like "universal" because everyone use it.
So my question is if there is a known bogoliubov transformation for 3 differents bosons in a hamiltonian...
( I hope you understand my english :) )
 
I can certainly tell you that a solution exists, at least in the fermionic case, because the Bogoliubov transformation is used routinely in nuclear physics, where you can have ~100 protons and neutrons. Sorry not to be able to supply the actual solution you want :-)
 
In this case, the 3 bosons operators are different, I have: a, b and c.
I guess that for ~100 differents protons the transformation must be huge!

I also guess that the bogoliubov transformation for fermions should not be so different from that of bosons......at least I have some hope! :)
thanks
 
So, introducing the vector A=(a_k, a^*_{-k}, b_k, b^*_{-k},c_k, c^*_{-k})^T,
you should be able to write your hamiltonian as H=A^\dagger M(k) A. Then you have to find the unitary transformation U which diagonalizes the matrix M, i.e., you have to solve the eigenvalue problem for M. Then the vector of the alphas is UA.
Not a big deal, in principle.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top