Bomb explosion -- calculating the momentum of one of the fragments

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the momentum of fragments from a bomb explosion, emphasizing that the total momentum must balance out regardless of the direction of the fragments. One participant initially expresses doubt about their approach but later acknowledges that the direction of movement does not affect the overall momentum balance. The importance of considering the resultant vector in opposite directions is highlighted. A request for verification of another post is made, indicating a desire for further clarification on related topics. The conversation ultimately reinforces the principle of momentum conservation in explosive events.
rudransh verma
Gold Member
Messages
1,067
Reaction score
96
Homework Statement
A bomb at rest explodes into 3 parts of the same mass. The momentum of the 2parts is -2pi^ and pj^. The momentum magnitude of the third part will be
Relevant Equations
##\vec R=\sqrt{{a\hat i}^2+{b\hat j}^2}##
I think if the two parts move in -x and +y direction, it must be balanced by the resultant of the two vectors but in opposite direction.
So ##p\sqrt5## will be the answer.
But I don’t think this is the right way to solve this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rudransh verma said:
I think if the two parts move in -x and +y direction, it must be balanced by the resultant of the two vectors but in opposite direction.
It doesn't matter what direction the two parts move. Their total momentum must be balanced by that of the third part.
rudransh verma said:
But I don’t think this is the right way to solve this.
Why not?
 
Doc Al said:
It doesn't matter what direction the two parts move. Their total momentum must be balanced by that of the third part.
Oh. So this is right. Thanks again.
Can you verify my other post?
 
rudransh verma said:
Can you verify my other post?
What post? Provide a link.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top