Book on String Theory: Start w/ Zwiebach?

AI Thread Summary
Barton Zwiebach's book on string theory is considered an accessible starting point for those with a foundational understanding of general relativity (GR), quantum mechanics (QM), and classical mechanics. A background in GR at the level of Schutz or Hartle, and QM at the level of Griffiths, is deemed sufficient. While knowledge of Heisenberg QM, quantum field theory (QFT), and group theory is not strictly necessary, familiarity with basic quantum principles, special relativity, and tensor calculus is recommended. The book addresses the connection between different quantum mechanics frameworks and includes discussions relevant to particle physics, though prerequisites are kept minimal. There is an inquiry about whether Zwiebach's book covers the derivation of nonlinear GR from string theory, indicating interest in the book's depth regarding advanced topics.
AuraCrystal
Messages
67
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I was thinking of eventually studying some string theory and I came across Barton Zwiebach's book on the subject. Would this be a good place to start? I know some GR at the level of Schutz/Hartle, Schrodinger QM at the level of Griffiths, Classical Mechanics at the level of Marion & Thornton, and EM.

However, I don't know any Heisenberg QM, QFT, or Group Theory. Would this be a problem in getting through Zwiebach's book? If so, can anyone recommend some books on the subjects I have listed?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Auracrystal,

I was in a similar situation as you. I knew quantum on the level of griffiths, EM with griffiths and some basic mechanics (I used fowles, random book don't ask).

You don't really need GR beyond knowing the linearized form of Einsteins equations and you probably have enough background. You're level of GR is probably more than enough.

I didn't have any background in the Heisenberg picture beyond what I read in Sakurai and really no background in QFT. Group theory won't really be necessary either except for maybe the chapter on particle physics. Overall the prerequisites are kept to a minimal. Zwiebach goes over the connection between the two pictures. You just need a good background in basic quantum, special relativity and tensor calculus.
 
Thanks for the advice!

Does Zwiebach's book explain string theory's derivation of nonlinear GR?
 
TL;DR Summary: Book after Sakurai Modern Quantum Physics I am doing a comprehensive reading of sakurai and I have solved every problem from chapters I finished on my own, I will finish the book within 2 weeks and I want to delve into qft and other particle physics related topics, not from summaries but comprehensive books, I will start a graduate program related to cern in 3 months, I alreadily knew some qft but now I want to do it, hence do a good book with good problems in it first...
TLDR: is Blennow "Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering" a good follow-up to Altland "Mathematics for physicists"? Hello everybody, returning to physics after 30-something years, I felt the need to brush up my maths first. It took me 6 months and I'm currently more than half way through the Altland "Mathematics for physicists" book, covering the math for undergraduate studies at the right level of sophystication, most of which I howewer already knew (being an aerospace engineer)...

Similar threads

Back
Top