Classical What Is the Best Path to Tackle Goldstein's Classical Mechanics?

AI Thread Summary
At 16, a student passionate about physics has accelerated their education by completing precalculus and Apostol's Calculus Volume 1. They are considering tackling Goldstein's classical mechanics but are aware of its complexity without sufficient background. Recommendations suggest starting with Kleppner's mechanics, as the student has the necessary mathematical foundation from Apostol. After Kleppner, Taylor's text is advised. While multivariable calculus, covered in Apostol Volume 2, is essential, it is not immediately necessary for Kleppner. Caution is noted regarding the difference in calculus approaches between Kleppner and Apostol, particularly the use of infinitesimals in Kleppner. The Feynman Lectures are recommended as supplementary material rather than a primary resource. Goldstein is recognized as a graduate-level text, indicating it may be more suitable after completing Taylor.
Niceadam
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
im 16,love physics, who is about to graduate school, before that i decided that school was too slow for me, so i decided to skip right to the good stuff...
did precalculus and 'How to Prove it' to start me on calculus.
i just finished Apostol's calculus vol 1 to prepare me for handling the mathematics to come in physics. i wanted to tackle Goldstein's classical mechanics but i heard its tough to handle without any background. i read that Taylor or Kleppner might be good to get me started as well as the Feynman lectures, what's your opinion?
my physics is at the level of freshman, but i can handle tough stuff..
and at what point do i need start learning multivariable, like say apostol vol 2?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Niceadam said:
im 16,love physics, who is about to graduate school, before that i decided that school was too slow for me, so i decided to skip right to the good stuff...
did precalculus and 'How to Prove it' to start me on calculus.
i just finished Apostol's calculus vol 1 to prepare me for handling the mathematics to come in physics. i wanted to tackle Goldstein's classical mechanics but i heard its tough to handle without any background. i read that Taylor or Kleppner might be good to get me started as well as the Feynman lectures, what's your opinion?
my physics is at the level of freshman, but i can handle tough stuff..
and at what point do i need start learning multivariable, like say apostol vol 2?

I recommend doing Kleppner right now. If you know Apostol v1, then you definitely know enough math to do Kleppner. After Kleppner, you should do Taylor.
As for Apostol v2, this covers multivariable calculus. That is obviously important, so I wouldn't postpone it for long. But it's not necessary to know in order to do Kleppner.

A word of warning which might or might not bother you (it bothered me): the calculus as done in Kleppner is somewhat different from Apostol. Kleppner fully uses the language of infinitesimals, which never really appear in Apostol. This might be confusing. If you wish to see calculus as framed in the language of infinitesimals, see Keisler's free book: https://www.math.wisc.edu/~keisler/calc.html

The Feynman lectures are pretty great, but don't use them as main resource. They're useful as a secondary resource only. I recommend studying a chapter in Kleppner and then reading what Feynman has to see about it as a second opinion. You will probably want to revisit the same chapters in Feynman over and over again in your career...
 
Thanks, and how about Goldstein? should i do it after taylor? or does taylor cover as much goldstein?
 
Niceadam said:
how about Goldstein?
Goldstein is a graduate-school (post-bachelors) level text, except maybe at schools like MIT or Caltech.
 
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
33
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
39
Views
7K
Replies
23
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
6K
Replies
20
Views
17K
Back
Top