Born Conditions on Wavefunctions

scarecrow
Messages
139
Reaction score
0
Born's conditions for an acceptable "well-behaved" wavefunction F(x):
1. it must be finite everywhere, i.e. converge to 0 as x -> infinity
2. it must be single-valued
3. it must be a continuous function
4. and dF/dx must be continuous.

I'm having difficulty understanding the last condition for a specific example. I have a wavefunction, F(x) = exp[-|x|], and the derivative at x = 0 does not exist. Is dF/dx still continuous at x=0?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"Is dF/dx still continuous at x=0?"
It is not. If F' is not continuous, then F"-->infinity, which corresponds to an infinite energy in the Schrodinger eq. This can only happen at an infinite potential step, such as in what is called an "infinite square well".
 
And in such cases, the discontinuous step in the potential and in F' are idealizations which are not possible in reality, although they are useful as approximations to make the solutions simpler. In reality, the potential always varies continuously (although very rapidly in this case) and F' also varies continuously but rapidly.

Instead of a perfectly "vertical" potential step, V(x) might have a steep slope that is almost (but not quite) vertical, and F(x) has a short rounded section instead of a sharp kink.
 
F(x) is continuous and has a "cusp" at x = 0, hence the first derivative of F(x) is discontinous at x=0 and is only piecewise continuous. But this doesn't prevent F(x) from being an acceptable "well-behaved" wavefunction.

F(x) must be continuous, but F' can be piecewise continuous for the wavefunction to be an acceptable Born function.
This is a paraphrase from one of my textbooks.

So exp[-|x|] is an acceptable "well-behaved" wavefunction according to this?
 
The correct answer to your question is 'no it is not'. It cannot represent reality perfectly. However, it may be a good approximation of the true wavefunction away from 0.
 
By definition, an exact wave-function will have a constant local energy as a function of position. The cusp in the wave function at x = 0 poses no problems as the divergence in the kinetic component is exactly canceled by the potential term, namely the coulomb term. This is an exact wave-function and there are no problems here.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
9K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top