Why Do Fermion and Boson Operators Commute?

aaaa202
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2
For bosons we define states as eg.

ln> = l1 0 1 ... >

where the numbers denote how many particles belong to the j'th orbital.

And similarly for fermions. We then define creation and anihillation operators which raise and lower the number of particles in the j'th orbital:

c_j, c_j^(dagger)

Now in many problems I have to commute bosons and fermion operators. I actually asked this question before, but I didn't completely understand the answer. My question is:
Why does fermion and boson operators commute? starting from the wavefunction symmetrization and antisymmetrization requirement
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is it possible that one only acts on bosons and one only acts on fermions so it doesn't matter which one you do first. (Just a guess as I know zero about this. But hey it's Friday night, why not look a bit silly!)
 
It's been a while so I hope someone won't come along and tell me this is nonsense. But if I recall correctly, the reason is they live in different spaces. If you have a boson state ##|b\rangle## and a fermion state ##|f\rangle## then a combined state would be ##|b, f\rangle = |b\rangle \otimes |f\rangle##. A bosonic operator would look like ##\hat B \otimes 1## on this combined space, and a fermionic operator similarly like ##1 \otimes \hat F##.

Typing math on a smartphone is a bit of a pain, so I'll leave it at this, but hopefully you can work it out from there.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top