Both the object and the particles can move?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hootenanny
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Particles
Hootenanny
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
9,621
Reaction score
9
Consider a sealed box with a set number of particles in, plus an object which has a massive volume compared to the other particles. In which case will there be more particle - object collisions?

(a)If the the object is static and all particles move.
(b)Both the object and the particles can move?

Any input would be appreciated :smile:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If all velocities are equal(both object and particles) and in random directions and consequently all particles are distributed randomly, one would expect both cases to give almost equal no of collisions.
Motion has little effect since averaged over time, these effects should cancel.Also no particular position is preferred.
 
Thanx arunbg
 
Thread 'Why is there such a difference between the total cross-section data? (simulation vs. experiment)'
Well, I'm simulating a neutron-proton scattering phase shift. The equation that I solve numerically is the Phase function method and is $$ \frac{d}{dr}[\delta_{i+1}] = \frac{2\mu}{\hbar^2}\frac{V(r)}{k^2}\sin(kr + \delta_i)$$ ##\delta_i## is the phase shift for triplet and singlet state, ##\mu## is the reduced mass for neutron-proton, ##k=\sqrt{2\mu E_{cm}/\hbar^2}## is the wave number and ##V(r)## is the potential of interaction like Yukawa, Wood-Saxon, Square well potential, etc. I first...
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top