Bounded & Closed Set: A = \{(x,y): 0\leq xy \leq 1\}

  • Thread starter Thread starter Somefantastik
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bounded Closed
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves determining whether the set A = {(x,y): 0 ≤ xy ≤ 1} is bounded and/or closed in R². Participants are exploring the definitions and implications of boundedness and closedness in the context of this set.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the conditions for boundedness and closedness, questioning how to demonstrate that ||X|| ≤ k and whether limit points belong to the set. There is also exploration of specific cases, such as when x = 0, to understand the implications for y.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights and questioning assumptions. Some guidance has been offered regarding sketching the set to aid in understanding, and there is acknowledgment of the complexity of the definitions being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the set is not finite, raising questions about its boundedness, and there is a reminder that being "not finite" does not necessarily imply "not bounded." The discussion reflects on the nuances of these mathematical concepts without reaching a definitive conclusion.

Somefantastik
Messages
226
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A = \left\{(x,y): 0\leq xy \leq 1\right\}, A \in R^{2}

I'm trying to determine if this set is bounded and/or closed.


Homework Equations



if X = (x,y)

euclidean metric: ||X|| = \sqrt{x^{2}+y^{2}}

The Attempt at a Solution





I know a bounded set => ||X|| \leq k

so I need to show somehow

||X|| = \sqrt{x^{2}+y^{2}} \leq k (somehow)

and closed => every limit point belongs to the set. So take an arbitrary X'= (x',y') \in A'. Then there exists Xn = (x,y) \in A such that Xn -> X' and Xn \neq X'.

Xn \in A => 0 \leq xy \leq 1

Need to show X' is such that 0 \leq x'y' \leq 1 (somehow)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If x=0 for what values of y would you have 0<=xy<=1?
 
Martin Rattigan said:
If x=0 for what values of y would you have 0<=xy<=1?

I see, all values of y, so this set is not finite and therefore not bounded?
 
Correct.

Have you sketched it? The sketch wouldn't prove anything, but it can be helpful to suggest a proof for the next bit.
 
Martin's advice of sketching the set seems to me a good one. For each nonzero value of k, with 0 < k <= 1, you have xy = k, or y = k/x, a hyperbola.
 
In general though, "not finite" does not imply "not bounded", correct?
 
Correct. Just take [0,1] in the reals
 
Yes, sorry, I shouldn't have written, "Correct". But I knew what you meant.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K