1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Brachistochrone curve - Gravity and other influences

  1. Sep 21, 2007 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    http://content.answers.com/main/content/wp/en/d/d4/Brachistochrone.png [Broken]
    Go to the link and look at this brachistochrone curve. The brachistochrone problem is supposed to find the fastest path between to points for an object under only the influence of gravity, correct?

    Then how does the problem even have a solution when the coordinates are at the same height. How can the the particle swoop back up under only the influence of gravity?

    2. Relevant equations

    3. The attempt at a solution
    Last edited by a moderator: May 3, 2017
  2. jcsd
  3. Sep 21, 2007 #2
    There is nothing wrong if they are at the same height. There are no damping forces like friction or air resistance. It's simply the energy law, it comes to the same height and then swoop back, like pendulum.
  4. Sep 21, 2007 #3
    So, it is always assumed that the particle is attached to wire or has some sort of constraint? Is the constraint always the same?
  5. Sep 21, 2007 #4
    brachistochrone is a constraint. You want to calculate what shape should constraint have that time of travelling will be minimal. It doesn't matter what type of constraint is it, it's just a mathematical problem. It is also important that there are no damping forces, which is of course just ideal case.
  6. Sep 21, 2007 #5
    I see, and the constraint is almost always in the form of a normal force, such as in the classic example where they are at the same height, right?
  7. Sep 21, 2007 #6
    yes, for the fastest path the constraint (brachistochrone) is in the plane parallel to force. But also you have for example the skier on the slope, the shortest path is still brachistochrone, only that now it lies in the plane of the slope.
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook