1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Brachistochrone. Why a curve at all?

  1. Aug 1, 2013 #1
    Why is the solution to the brachistochrone problem a curve at all? If the idea is to get from a higher point to a lower point under the influence of gravity alone, why is a straight line not quicker than a cycloid? It seems counter-intuitive that the shortest time would be along a curve and not a straight line. Even more so if that curve contains a segment where the object is moving upwards, and being slowed by gravity.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Aug 1, 2013 #2

    SteamKing

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

  4. Aug 1, 2013 #3

    A.T.

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Consider the extreme cases:

    endpoint is exactly below startpoint : Here the quickest way actually is a straight line

    endpoint at same height as startpoint : Here a straight line will need infinite time, because you will never start moving. The only way to reach the endpoint is to go down and up again.

    So in general, you need a compromise, that will somehow get you going initially, but won't be too far away from the straight line.

    In other words :

    time = path_length / avg_speed

    Minimizing path_length alone doesn't help if avg_speed goes to zero. You have to optimize both.
     
    Last edited: Aug 1, 2013
  5. Aug 2, 2013 #4

    sophiecentaur

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    This is a reasonable question - if you want Science to be 'reasonable' and 'acceptable' to your intuition. But why should you ever assume that Science works that way?
    Throughout history, people have tried to approach things intuitively and it has led to many unsatisfactory results. Life became more predictable and things started to 'work' for us, once we started to apply the 'Scientific Approach'. Greek Philosophers sat down an pontificated about the way the Universe works and they didn't do Experiments. They got it wrong. Such a shame, because their maths was actually quite good.
    The reason that the solution to the brachistochrone is not a single straight line path can be found by applying very straightforward maths to some very basic principles. The fact is that there is a Faster solution than a straight line - you could easily find a faster one by choosing two straight lines instead. So your intuition could then, possibly, accept that an even better solution could be obtained with an infinite set of short lines (a curve). It's a small step, then, to let the maths take over and give you a Cycloid curve.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Brachistochrone. Why a curve at all?
  1. Why all the nutcases? (Replies: 86)

Loading...