How Do You Calculate the Lattice Constant Using Bragg's Law?

vebbie
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
need help working out this problem. if you have a simple cubic lattice characterised using x-ray diffraction with a wavelegth of 1.6\dot{A}. The main peak in the scan is (222) and the angle is 32 degrees. By using braggs law to find the lattice constant do you just sub in the values and solve for d? (n\lambda=dSin\theta. If so what value do you use for "n".
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is the diffraction order, use 1 for the first order diffraction lobe.
 
but does the peak have any use for the calculation. suppos it was the 422 peak
 
d is the spacing of the (222) planes. If you were looking at the (422) reflection, then d would be the spacing of the (422) planes. You might have to do some geometry to get the lattice spacing from the data.
 
"but does the peak have any use for the calculation. suppos it was the 422 peak"

The index n is a consequence of the fact that reflections occur when (k - k') = G. Braggs Law diffraction condition is a simplification of the Laue Condition for diffraction: (k - k') = G. The higher order peaks are forward scattering instead of backwards scattering so you won't be able to see them in a standard diffractometer. You would nee to generate a Laue pattern to see these peaks. To answer your question you don't need these peaks.

modey3
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top