Branching ratio of particle question

  • Thread starter Thread starter RyanTG
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Particle Ratio
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the decay properties of the J/Ψ particle, which has equal branching ratios of 6% to e+e− and µ+µ− final states. If the J/Ψ decayed only electromagnetically, the expected branching ratios would differ, indicating the relative strength of the strong interaction in these decays. Participants express confusion over branching functions and the implications of strong versus electromagnetic interactions, noting that strong forces dominate with much shorter lifetimes. The conversation highlights that hadronic decay is heavily suppressed, with a significant majority of decays resulting in lepton pairs. Understanding these ratios is crucial for grasping the underlying physics of particle interactions.
RyanTG
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The J/Ψ has mass 3097 MeV, width 87 keV and equal branching ratios of 6%
to e+e− and µ+µ− final states. What would you expect for these branching
ratios if the J/Ψ decayed only electromagnetically? What does this tell you
about the “strength” of the strong interaction in this decay?


Homework Equations


Branching function = Width/Sum of all Widths

Don't know whether this will be useful or not but:

Lifetime of u = 2.2*10-6
Mass of u = 106MeV/c2

The Attempt at a Solution



I don't really know what to do, I don't understand branching functions that well and I'm not even sure if the question requires me to calculate anything, I'm confused.

I know that strong forces dominate and that the average lifetime for strong interactions is ~10-24seconds whilst EM ~ 10-18.

This isn't homework really, this is just revision for an examination I have tomorrow. If somebody could just explain this briefly, that would help immensely.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not sure (hopefully someone else jumps in if I am wrong), but if hadrons are excluded, then only 50/50 e+e- / mu+/mu- remains, isn't it ?

Get some rest, much better than last-minute worries for an examination :approve:!

12% leptons vs 88% hadrons is already very high because hadronic decay is heavily suppressed. See wikipedia and https://pdg.web.cern.ch/pdg/2012/listings/rpp2012-list-J-psi-1S.pdf and this link which illustrates this OZI suppression.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top