Breakdown Potential of Parallel Plates Capacitor

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mr Genius
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Potential
AI Thread Summary
The breakdown potential of a parallel plates capacitor is defined by the equation Vmax = Emax × d, where d represents the distance between the plates. This relationship indicates that the maximum voltage is directly proportional to both the electric field strength and the distance. The electric field (E) is expressed as the change in voltage (dV) over the change in distance (dx). Dimensional analysis can aid in understanding this relationship, as the units of electric field are volts per meter. Understanding these equations is crucial for analyzing capacitor behavior in electrical circuits.
Mr Genius
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
I want to know, for a given parallel plates capacitor, the breakdown potential equals to
Vmax=Emax × d or Vmax=Emax/d
Where d is the distance between the plates of the capacitor
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since E=dV/dx..
Mr Genius said:
Vmax=Emax × d
 
  • Like
Likes Mr Genius
Mr Genius said:
I want to know, for a given parallel plates capacitor, the breakdown potential equals to
Vmax=Emax × d or Vmax=Emax/d
Where d is the distance between the plates of the capacitor
In addition to cnh1995's answer, you can use dimensional analysis to help you remember the answer. Just remember that the units of Electric Field are Volts per meter. :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes Mr Genius
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top