Breaking Hamiltonian of a particle

Manojg
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
Dear all,

I have a fundamental question about breaking the Hamiltonian. Here is the description:

Suppose a particle, \lambda^{0}, is produced in a high energy nuclear collision with proton beam. It is produced by strong interaction, and it has fixed energy (can be obtained from its momentum and mass). Its propagation with time is given by unitary operator.

\hat{U}(t, 0) = exp(-i\hat{H}t)

The momentum that it got is created by physics involving strong interaction during the collision. So, the Hamiltonian is Strong Hamiltonian, \hat{H}_{S}.

This \lambda^{0} decays via weak interaction. I have seen in books that its Hamiltonian can be break into strong, electromagnetic and weak part, \hat{H} = \hat{H}_{S} + \hat{H}_{EM} + \hat{H}_{W}. How other Hamiltonians come here?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The Hamiltonian appearing in your expression is the general Hamiltonian describing all the interactions that influence the evolution of the particle. While it might be created via a strong interaction, it subsequently evolves according to all allowed interactions; for example, it might radiate a Z_0 or photon.
 
bapowell said:
The Hamiltonian appearing in your expression is the general Hamiltonian describing all the interactions that influence the evolution of the particle. While it might be created via a strong interaction, it subsequently evolves according to all allowed interactions; for example, it might radiate a Z_0 or photon.

Major decay mode of \lambda are \lambda \rightarrow p \pi^{-} \text{and} ~\lambda \rightarrow n \pi^{0}. These are weak decays, and \hat{H}_{EM} and \hat{H}_{W} are reffered in these cases.
 
Manojg said:
Major decay mode of \lambda are \lambda \rightarrow p \pi^{-} \text{and} ~\lambda \rightarrow n \pi^{0}. These are weak decays, and \hat{H}_{EM} and \hat{H}_{W} are reffered in these cases.
Right. And they're included in the full Hamiltonian, correct? I think I'm misunderstanding your question.
 
Manojg said:
The momentum that it got is created by physics involving strong interaction during the collision. So, the Hamiltonian is Strong Hamiltonian, \hat{H}_{S}.
This is just an approximation. The other parts of the full hamiltonian are present during the production, too, but their influence on the production is small as the strong force is much stronger than the electroweak stuff.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top