Brilliant integral calculation

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
3 replies · 2K views
Messages
5,706
Reaction score
1,592
I just saw this and thought that sometimes people can get a bit too carried away with their mathematical notation. Hope you enjoy!

http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/9690/weirdintegralcalculatio.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Office_Shredder said:
I just saw this and thought that sometimes people can get a bit too carried away with their mathematical notation.

The notation seems completely fine to me. What is excessive about it? The parenthesis around the 1/12?
 
Office_Shredder said:
I just saw this and thought that sometimes people can get a bit too carried away with their mathematical notation. Hope you enjoy!

http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/9690/weirdintegralcalculatio.jpg

I don't think it's excessive. Certainly, multiplying everything out would make the integration dead simple, but his/her approach was pretty concise and interesting. Sometimes, a little extra complexity makes for a much more interesting argument (e.g. my favourite proof of the infinitude of prime numbers uses topology).
 
Last edited by a moderator: