Broglie wavelength - calculate electric potential difference

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric potential difference for electrons in a TV tube, given their wavelength of 1.0 x 10^{-11} m. The initial calculations for velocity and potential difference are presented, but there are errors in the kinetic energy calculation and unit consistency. Participants highlight the importance of using the correct formula for kinetic energy, specifically noting the need to square the velocity. Additionally, the speed of the electrons approaches relativistic effects, although the non-relativistic calculation remains accurate within a small margin of error. Clarifications on unit conversions and formula application are emphasized to ensure correct results.
pbonnie
Messages
92
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In a TV tube, an electric potential difference accelerates electrons from a rest position towards a screen. Just before striking the screen, the electrons have a wavelength of 1.0 x 10^{-11} m. Find the electric potential difference.

Homework Equations


λ = h/mv
ΔE_k = qΔV

The Attempt at a Solution


v = h/λm = (6.63x10^{-34}Js)/(1.0x10^{-11}m)(9.11x10^{-31})
= 7.3 x 10^7 m/s
I rearranged the second equation to solve for ΔV
ΔV = ((1/2)(9.11x10^{-31}kg)(7.3x10^7m/s))/(1.60 x 10^-19c)
= 2.1 x 10^{-4} V

I was just wondering if someone could let me know if I'm doing this right? Sorry for not using latex properly, I'm not really sure how to make fractions.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello.

Your method looks good. But you need to check your calculation of the kinetic energy of the electron.
 
Units

Another good way to see that your calculation went awry is to check your units instead of just writing Volts as the units for the answer.

kg*(m/s)/C are the units on your product in the final line of your calculation before the answer. But Volts are J/C

We know that a Joule is not a kg*m/s, but should be a kg*m2/s2.

Hope this helps.

Dr Peter Vaughan
BASIS Peoria Physics
 
Ah thank you both very much. I wrote down the 1/2mv^2 in my actual work but forgot to do the calculation.

Thank you:)
 
Good work!

Note that you got a speed of the electron that is about 24% the speed of light. This is encroaching on the domain of relativity. But your non-relativistic answer is accurate to within 2% error.
 
Last edited:
i think for the Ek formula should be 1/2mv^2 and seems you missed the to square the 7.3E7m/s
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...

Similar threads

Back
Top