Building a Conductivity Tester with LED Indicators for Chemistry Class

  • Thread starter Thread starter nemrehs1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conductivity
AI Thread Summary
A conductivity tester is being developed for a chemistry class, utilizing three LED indicators to display liquid conductivity levels. The challenge lies in ensuring that the LEDs only light up at specific voltage levels, as small differences in salinity do not produce noticeable visual changes. To address this, a redesign of the circuit is needed to better indicate minor salinity variations while maintaining ease of use. Suggestions include determining the specific range of conductance to focus on and amplifying signals above that threshold. Collaboration with others working on similar projects, such as those involving Wheatstone bridges, may provide additional insights.
nemrehs1
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Okay...in my engineering class we have to build an invention. My partner and I are building a conductivity tester. We are using three levels of LED indicators, to tell how conductive the liquid is. I don't want an LED to light up when it isn't supposed to, so I am trying to use an Op Amp voltage level detector, so the voltage has to reach a certain point for the LED to light up. But the problem is, the different levels of salinity are so small there is no visual difference in the LED. I need to redesign a circuit that indicates the small differences in the levels of salinity. These circuits are being built for a chemistry class, so the circuit has to be easy to handle. Any ideas?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
You need to figure out the actual range of conductance in which you are interested, then null out anything below that range and amplify the rest. Some one else on this list is asking about wheatstone bridges and strain gauges, and your application is very similar. Maybe you can help each other...
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top