Building a Guitar Effects Pedal

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the design and construction of a guitar effects pedal, focusing on the selection of electronic components, particularly op-amps and capacitors. Participants explore various circuit design considerations, component availability, and potential modifications to existing schematics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the use of the 741C op-amp, suggesting it is outdated and only used for its low cost, while another defends its adequacy for the project.
  • There is a suggestion that if the LT1215 is indeed meant, the 741C would not be suitable due to the former being a quad op-amp.
  • Some participants propose that while the 741 may be sufficient, better op-amps are available for a small additional cost, which could mitigate issues like DC offset or noise.
  • Concerns are raised about the necessity of using tantalum capacitors versus standard electrolytic ones, with one participant expressing uncertainty about soldering difficulties and cost.
  • A participant inquires about salvaging components from an old DVD player, prompting further discussion about the feasibility of using such components in the pedal design.
  • Another participant shares a resource for finding schematics for effects pedals online, indicating that there are many available despite previous difficulties in locating them.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the suitability of the 741C op-amp compared to the LT1215, with no consensus reached on the necessity of specific capacitor types. The discussion includes both support for using the 741 and arguments for exploring better alternatives, indicating a lack of agreement on the best approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the importance of component stability under varying conditions and the potential for redesigning circuits to accommodate different op-amps, highlighting the complexity of the design process.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in electronics, particularly those looking to build or modify guitar effects pedals, as well as those seeking resources for circuit schematics.

chaoseverlasting
Messages
1,051
Reaction score
3
Hello all! I am building an effects pedal for my guitar (dont have a choice, I spent all the money I was saving on the guitar). Since electronic components are cheap, for once, I am glad I am studying EE.

At first I thought I'd design the circuits myself, but after doing a bit of research, I found a load of schematics available on whatever effects pedal I want, I do have a couple of questions though...

Ive used 741c op amps in all my practicals and I am familiar with them, however, can I use the 741C instead of T-1215 op amp?

Also is it absolutely necessary that I use the te series capacitors when required or will standard electrolytic ones suffice?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Any specific reason why you would use a 741?
You do know that the 741 is really ancient and the only reason why it is still being used is because it is extremely cheap? I can't think of a good reason to use it for anything if you have a choice (unless you like the sound of it, even "bad" components can work in an effects pedal)


Anyway, do you mean LT1215? If so the answer is no, 1215 is a precision quad op-amp.
 
The 741 is still used because it is good enough in the cases it is used in, and of course it is cheap. It in all probability is good enough in this case.
 
Averagesupernova said:
It in all probability is good enough in this case.

Well, not if chaoseverlasting really meant LT1215 since that is a quad op-amp:wink:; I believe the quad version of 741 is called LM-something...

I agree that 741 is often good enough, and if you are planning to mass-produce something cost might an issue.
However, you can get a significantly better op-amp for literally only pennies more so if there is any risk that e.g. dc-offset or noise can be issue (as it could be here) I would use something better.

Although if you have a "free" supply of 741 you could always start with that and replace it later if you want to (as long as it is in a socket).
That is, if you really only need a single op-amp.
 
Someone once said a good design is one that the circuit will remain stable and work under the most varying conditions.
 
The thing is I'm familiar with the 741 cause I've been using it a lot. Other than that there's no particular reason. Also I think its the most easily available one. I may have to search around for the 1215. Also about the tantalum cap, is it absolutely necessary? From what I know you have to be really good at soldering to use it cause its easy to burn out and I don't know how expensive it'll be. Also 'normal' electrolytic caps are easier to find.
 
Another thing, I have an old DVD player that's no longer used. Its a sony player, is there anything that I could directly whack off of it?
 
Was I right to assume you meant LT1215?
If so a 741 will -as I wrote above- definitely not work. LT1215 is a QUAD op-amp (=4 op-amps in the same capsule). Although I guess there is nothing stopping you from re-designing the circuit to use 4 individual op-amps instead (although it would make the circuit somewhat more complicatet).
 
What about using some of the chips off of the Sony player?
 
  • #10
Where did you find schematics for effects pedals online? I am interested in making my own as well, but when I did a search a couple of months ago I couldn't find anything.
 
  • #11
Monocles said:
Where did you find schematics for effects pedals online? I am interested in making my own as well, but when I did a search a couple of months ago I couldn't find anything.

Are you kidding? There's lots. http://www.diystompboxes.com/pedals/schematics.html" , it's one of the bigger ones. (plenty of links to others, suppliers, kit makers etc)
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
24K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K