Is it possible to build a magnetic monopole using permanent magnets?

AI Thread Summary
Building a magnetic monopole using permanent magnets is theoretically impossible due to the nature of magnetic fields. When wedge-shaped magnets are arranged with the same pole facing outward, the field lines still loop back, preventing the creation of a true monopole. Even if the wedges were perfectly sealed, the internal magnetic field would weaken externally, leading to a cancellation of poles. Attempts to create monopoles have been as futile as efforts to build perpetual motion machines, as fundamental physics principles dictate that such constructs cannot exist. The consensus is that any arrangement will ultimately result in a balance of magnetic poles, negating the possibility of a monopole.
DuckAmuck
Messages
238
Reaction score
40
Has anyone attempted build a magnetic monopole?

If you took a bunch of wedge-shaped permanent magnets and assembled them into a ball such that the same pole for each magnet was pointing out radially, then you would have a magnetic monopole. (see attached).
 

Attachments

  • monopole.png
    monopole.png
    42.8 KB · Views: 492
Physics news on Phys.org
No. The field lines always circle back to the other end of each dipole.
 
That would only happen if there were gaps, right? What if you could theoretically seal the wedges together perfectly?
 
The more you try and constrain the field on the inside the weaker it becomes on the outside. A perfect "seal" would result in no magnetic field on the outside. In practice you will probably end up with a semi random pattern of weak poles of both types.
 
Many people have attempted, just as many people have attempted to build perpetual motion machines. But anyone versed in physics knows that this won't work.

You have as many south poles on the inside of your sphere as you have north poles on the outside, so they cancel out. The outside of the sphere can't "shield" the poles on the inside, and the fact that the outside is closer to you doesn't help since it all cancels out for a sphere. You can prove this to yourself if you know some multivariable calculus.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top